Are There Simplification Rules for Modulo 1 Arithmetic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter svensl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arithmetic
svensl
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was wondering whether there are any simplification/rules when doing modulo 1 arithmetic.

For example: <a+b>*<c+d> = ? or <a+b>^2=?
Here, <> is the fractional part, i.e <4.2> = 0.2

There is plenty I could find on mod N arithmetic with n>1 but nothing on mod 1.

thanks for any tips.

Svensl
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mattmns, read his post, he's obviously not just talking about integers. He's talking about the reals modulo 1, i.e. arithmetic of the fractional parts of reals.

svensl, what do you mean by "simplification rules"? For example, what could you find on mod N arithmetic?
 
AKG said:
mattmns, read his post, he's obviously not just talking about integers. He's talking about the reals modulo 1, i.e. arithmetic of the fractional parts of reals.

Woops! :redface: I knew I had to be missing something, sorry.
 
Thanks for the reply.

With modulo N arithmetic I was referring to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_arithmetic for example.

If N=12 as in hour clock system, I could say that (13 mod 12)*(14 mod 12) = 2 = ((13*14) mod 12) = 2. This I meant by simplification. However, these rules do not work for cases for mod 1. So, (1.222 mod 1)*(5.111 mod 1) is not equal to ((0.222*0.111) mod 1). I was wondering whether there are rules for this sort of thing.

For example, I can write <a + b > = <<a>+<b>>. Again <> stands for mod 1.
Or, <-a> = 1 - <a>.

Are there any for multiplication?

thanks,
svensl
 
If N=12 as in hour clock system, I could say that (13 mod 12)*(14 mod 12) = 2 = ((13*14) mod 12) = 2. This I meant by simplification. However, these rules do not work for cases for mod 1. So, (1.222 mod 1)*(5.111 mod 1) is not equal to ((0.222*0.111) mod 1).

Yes but it's not the difference between "1" and "12" that's operating here, it's the far more fundamental difference that in one case you're doing modulo arithmetic over the integers and in the other case you're doing it over the reals.

Try doing modulo 12 arithmetic over the reals and see how many of those results still hold.
 
Thanks for pointing this out uart.

Do you know of any literature which talks about mod 1? There is a wealth of literature on equidistributed mod 1 sequences, number theory, ergodic theory...but I have not found helping me whith my problem.

Cheers,
svensl
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top