A Are these papers on Quantum Electrodynamics true?

[jonjacson]

TL;DR Summary

Did Kroll & Karplus really lied to us?

https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.10345

My question is, Has the Feynman Diagram IIc been published or not?

Did Kroll & Karplus lie or not?

https://vixra.org/abs/2002.0011

Are these critics valid?

 

[Dale]

Summary:: Did Kroll & Karplus really lied to us?

Are these critics valid?

Probably not. Progress in Physics is most likely a predatory publisher. Very often predatory publishers choose journal names that are similar to respected journals.

In this case “Progress in Physics” is trying to masquerade as “Reports on Progress in Physics” which is a well-known journal that is indexed and has a decent impact factor.

“Progress in Physics”, in contrast, does not even show up on the Clarivate master journal list and has not even been given an impact factor. The low response and deceptive title are indicative of predatory publishers.

This thread is closed. If you find a professional scientific reference on this topic please send me a PM with the reference and I can reopen the thread.

 

[Nugatory]

Summary:: Did Kroll & Karplus really lied to us?
……
https://vixra.org/abs/2002.0011

The forum rules explicitly disallow Vixra as a source. It’s that unreliable (or more precisely, reliably bad).