Are These Physics Questions Correct in English and Science?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the accuracy of two physics questions written by non-native English-speaking teachers. The first question involves a child swinging through 32°, with a debate on whether the amplitude is 8°, 16°, or another value, with suggestions for clearer wording. The second question addresses the angular displacement of a pendulum with an amplitude of 0.17 rad, where there is confusion about the correct answer and terminology used, particularly the distinction between angular displacement and angular distance. Participants emphasize the need for clarity in phrasing to avoid ambiguity in student assessments. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of precise language in both English and physics for educational purposes.
bahtiyar
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
hi, we are a few non-native English speaker physics teacher and we wrote some questions for an assessment book
but we can't be sure about this two similar question.
a) are they accurate for rules of English, are we use correct terms is there a necessary change?
b) are they accurate for rules of physics and are the answers accurate?
FIRST QUESTION

1. Homework Statement

A child on an playground swings through a total of 32°. If the displacement is equal on each side of the equilibrium position, what is the amplitude of this vibration?
a) 8° b)32° c)16° d)64°

Homework Equations


none

The Attempt at a Solution


one of my colleague says the answer should 8° I think it should be 16°
second

SECOND QUESTION

Homework Statement


the amplitude of a simple pendulum is 0.17 rad. what is the angular displacement of this pendulum for one complete cycle?
a)0.17 rad b)0.34 rad c) 0.51 rad d)0.68 rad

Homework Equations


none

The Attempt at a Solution


my colleague says the answer should 0.68 rad. I think it should be zero rad.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The English is ok. Might be better to say "after one complete cycle". Your answers are correct 16 and 0.

The distance is 0.64 rads, the displacement is 0 rads.
 
  • Like
Likes bahtiyar
my colleague says there is no such a term as angular distance, so "angular displacement for one complete cycle" corresponds 4 times amplitude.
Do you have any reference, a link or textbook that use these terms?
 
bahtiyar said:
A child on an playground swings through a total of 32°.
This is ambiguous. It might be counting multiple traverses of the same arc. Depending on what is intended, could clarify by specifying "in a single direction" or "in one complete cycle"...
bahtiyar said:
the displacement is equal
Which displacements? The maximum displacements from equilibrium or the initial and final displacements?
bahtiyar said:
angular displacement for one complete cycle" corresponds 4 times amplitude.
Certainly not.
"Displacement" always means net change, regardless of path taken. If your colleague does not like "angular distance" then some other term must be found which makes the meaning clear.
 
  • Like
Likes bahtiyar
bahtiyar said:
my colleague says there is no such a term as angular distance..

Normally we just use "angle" rather than angular distance. Angle can be greater than 2pi.
 
  • Like
Likes bahtiyar
CWatters said:
Normally we just use "angle" rather than angular distance. Angle can be greater than 2pi.
Yes, but in regard to wording a question for students I feel that in itself would not be clear enough.
 
  • Like
Likes bahtiyar
thank you guys for making it clear what are your suggestions and answers
 
Back
Top