Are These Wavefunctions Orthonormal in Spherical Coordinates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MontavonM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunctions
MontavonM
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Given 2 wavefunctions with respect to (r,theta,phi)...

To prove that the functions are orthonormal, you would let the first w.function = Y(psi) and the 2nd = Y* (psi star), then you would integrate --> SY*Y dr dtheta dphi (integral of psi* times psi) dr dtheta dphi.

Correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yeah, over a whole period, or the appropriate bounds.
 
MontavonM said:
Given 2 wavefunctions with respect to (r,theta,phi)...

To prove that the functions are orthonormal, you would let the first w.function = Y(psi) and the 2nd = Y* (psi star), then you would integrate --> SY*Y dr dtheta dphi (integral of psi* times psi) dr dtheta dphi.

Correct?

That looks like the wrong measure for spherical polar coordinates.
I would have expected something like:
<br /> \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi \int_0^\pi \sin\theta \; d\theta \int_0^\infty \bar f g \, r^2 dr <br />
where f,g are functions of r,\theta,\phi.

See also:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume_integral
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top