Are Units for Phase Calculations in Wave Problems Accurately Applied?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Properties Waves
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses several questions related to phase calculations in wave problems. For Q10, the correct unit is confirmed as rad/m, aligning with the metric for wave calculations. In Q20 and Q21, it's emphasized that points on a transverse wave can only exhibit vertical motion, affecting the interpretation of instantaneous velocity. For Q31, participants suggest using free body diagrams to analyze tensions, noting that cases 1 and 3 are equivalent due to equal forces. Overall, the conversation seeks clarification on wave mechanics and the application of physics principles.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
I have a few waves questions I would really like to have addressed. I'll post my logic/solution for each question and any feedback is welcome.

Q. 10: This one seems pretty straight forward but shouldn't the units be 3.0 rad/m? Since x is in meters and we're not changing the order of magnitude for any other variables, I don't quite see how the units cancel out properly...I'd just like to confirm this.

Q. 20 and 21: This seems also pretty simply but I may be missing something here. To find instantaneous velocity is to take the derivative (find slope of tangent) at a point. Looking at the question like this, my answer for 20 would be E and 21 would be D. Am I missing something fundamental here?

Q. 31: This question also didn't make complete sense to me. Looking at 3, the tension appears to be the greatest since there's one string and 2 masses for which it must be keep up. 2 looks like the lowest and 1 is intermediate, since FT ~ v2. Once again, am I missing something big here?

Any help with these questions would be great! Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-04-13 at 3.05.46 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-04-13 at 3.05.46 PM.png
    14.7 KB · Views: 501
  • Screen Shot 2014-04-13 at 3.19.37 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-04-13 at 3.19.37 PM.png
    14.1 KB · Views: 495
  • Screen Shot 2014-04-13 at 3.29.54 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-04-13 at 3.29.54 PM.png
    15.5 KB · Views: 534
Physics news on Phys.org
For Q10, you're right, the units should be rad/m.

For Q20 and Q21, try to imagine what happens to point P as the wave moves to the right. The waves are traverse in both cases, so a point "on" the wave cannot by definition have a longitudinal velocity component, just a traverse component, hence it can only go up or down.

As for Q31, I don't see any sort of picture so I can't really help out much.
 
kontejnjer said:
for q10, you're right, the units should be rad/m.

For q20 and q21, try to imagine what happens to point p as the wave moves to the right. The waves are traverse in both cases, so a point "on" the wave cannot by definition have a longitudinal velocity component, just a traverse component, hence it can only go up or down.

As for q31, i don't see any sort of picture so i can't really help out much.

q. 31
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-04-13 at 3.45.07 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-04-13 at 3.45.07 PM.png
    8.2 KB · Views: 482
If you haven't done so already, draw free body diagrams for all the cases depicted. You can then figure out the tensions in all of them. Notice that case 1 and 3 are equivalent because the forces on both ends of the rope are the same (in the first case, the wall must exert a force equal in magnitude to that of the weight of the block, otherwise it wouldn't be in equilibrium anymore).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top