Are Virtual Particles Real According to the Dynamic Casimir Effect Study?

dm4b
Messages
363
Reaction score
4
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1105/1105.4714v1.pdf

Does this paper shed any light on whether virtual particles are real, or not?

They are speaking colloquially, as if they are real, but it sounds like there are complementary explanations that do not need to use virtual particles. Not sure, though - it's over my head.

My understanding is also that the following paper (http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0503158) addressed only the static casimir effect, and does not apply to the DCE on the paper above. Is that true?

Thanks!
dm4b
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is correct. The paper you linked to focuses on the static Casimir effect and does not apply to the DCE discussed in the paper you mentioned.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top