Are we supposed to memorize Karnaugh maps?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tamtam402
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Memorizing the layout of Karnaugh maps is not strictly necessary, as each map is unique to the specific problem. It's recommended to understand the general structure of the "shell" for different input sizes, particularly for 2, 3, and 4-variable maps. Consistency in how variables are laid out is more important than memorizing a specific order. While some professors may prefer a certain layout, it is not critical for practical applications later on. Ultimately, mastering the use of Karnaugh maps will be more beneficial than memorizing their frames.
tamtam402
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, my professor briefly introduced Karnaugh maps and I was wondering if I'm supposed to memorize which areas correspond to which inputs (bits). Is there a trick to rebuild Karnaugh maps from memory? Just to be clear, I know how to use them to find a minimal sum of products, I'm talking about the maps "frames".
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
No. Each map is unique to the problem at hand. Memorize the reductions.
 
I'm not talking about the filled map, I'm talking about the "shell". For example, a 3 inputs map can always be drawn this way:

0 Y XY X
Z YZ XYZ XZThen, if I were asked to write an expression for F = ƩX,Y,Z(0,2,7), the filled map would look like this:

0 = 000, 2 = 010 and 7 = 111. Which means:

1 1 0 0
0 0 1 0EDIT: you were referencing to the 2nd part of the problem. I know the filled map is unique. I'm asking about the shell of the map, which will always have the same possible forms for a X inputs. Obviously the possible forms are easy to find for a 3 input map, but you should understand what I'm talking about.
 
tamtam402 said:
I'm not talking about the filled map, I'm talking about the "shell". For example, a 3 inputs map can always be drawn this way:

0 Y XY X
Z YZ XYZ XZ


Then, if I were asked to write an expression for F = ƩX,Y,Z(0,2,7), the filled map would look like this:

0 = 000, 2 = 010 and 7 = 111. Which means:

1 1 0 0
0 0 1 0


EDIT: you were referencing to the 2nd part of the problem. I know the filled map is unique. I'm asking about the shell of the map, which will always have the same possible forms for a X inputs. Obviously the possible forms are easy to find for a 3 input map, but you should understand what I'm talking about.

I think you should memorize the order of the bits for 2, 3, and 4 variable karnaugh maps . . its just remembering that one of the bit orders is flipped with 3 and 4 variables. That way you can set up your maps for those cases. This will cover you in an exam, but the professor might even be nice and write out the empty map for you. But you don't need to memorize this later in life if that's what you're asking.
 
It is utterly irrelevant what order you use to lay out the variables in a K-map. As long as you are consistent between what you draw and how you interpret it, you'll get the exact same answer regardless of the order of the variables.

If your prof wants you to stick to some specific layout, he is being WAY overly anal about it.
 
As you come along in your studies...solving the maps will be the easy part.

Setting up the maps from a tricky circuit will be the bigger challenge eventually.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top