Area in polar coordinate using multiple integral

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the area of a disk defined by the polar equation r ≤ 2a×cos(θ). Two integration methods were attempted, both yielding incorrect results, leading to confusion about the limits of integration. The correct approach involves integrating the area element dA = r dr dθ from r = 0 to r = 2a cos(θ) and θ = 0 to π/2, then multiplying by 2 for symmetry. Additionally, a question arose regarding the volume of a flipped cone, highlighting the importance of proper limits in integration for accurate results. The conversation emphasizes the need for careful consideration of integration boundaries and the relationship between r and θ in polar coordinates.
ahmed markhoos
Messages
49
Reaction score
2
The question is to find the area of a disk, r ≤ 2a×cos(θ)
as in the figure "example-just an illustration"

yvLb1.png
I used two methods, each gave different wrong answers

- integrate 2a×cos(θ) dθ dr - from θ=0 to θ=π/2 and from r=2a to r=2a×cos(θ) ; then I simply multiplied the answer by 2.

- integrate 2a×cos(θ) dθ dr - from θ=0 to θ=2π and from r=2a to r=2a×cos(θ)

I was hopping to get the right answer using the first method, but surprisingly it didn't work, integration seems to be fine I even used wolfram to check it.

-----------------

I have another small question. I had a question about finding the volume of flipped cone "its point in the origin and its shape is in the positive side of z-axis", its height is the same as its base radius so that, r=h z=h, thus r=z
"example-just an illustration"

http://01.edu-cdn.com/files/static/mcgrawhillprof/9780071624756/INVERTED_CONE_WATER_TANK_PROBLEM_01.GIF

thing is, when I put the limits say : r=0 ⇒ h //// z=0 ⇒ r //// θ=0 ⇒ 2π . It give wrong answer

but r=0 ⇒ z //// z=0 ⇒ h //// θ=0 ⇒ 2π . give the right one

that's really confusing!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ahmed markhoos said:
The question is to find the area of a disk, r ≤ 2a×cos(θ)
as in the figure "example-just an illustration"

yvLb1.png
I used two methods, each gave different wrong answers

- integrate 2a×cos(θ) dθ dr - from θ=0 to θ=π/2 and from r=2a to r=2a×cos(θ) ; then I simply multiplied the answer by 2.

- integrate 2a×cos(θ) dθ dr - from θ=0 to θ=2π and from r=2a to r=2a×cos(θ)

I was hopping to get the right answer using the first method, but surprisingly it didn't work, integration seems to be fine I even used wolfram to check it.
I have another small question. I had a question about finding the volume of flipped cone "its point in the origin and its shape is in the positive side of z-axis", its height is the same as its base radius so that, r=h z=h, thus r=z
"example-just an illustration"

http://01.edu-cdn.com/files/static/mcgrawhillprof/9780071624756/INVERTED_CONE_WATER_TANK_PROBLEM_01.GIF

thing is, when I put the limits say : r=0 ⇒ h //// z=0 ⇒ r //// θ=0 ⇒ 2π . It give wrong answer

but r=0 ⇒ z //// z=0 ⇒ h //// θ=0 ⇒ 2π . give the right one

that's really confusing!

In polar coordinates the area element is ##dA = r \, dr \, d \theta##. To get the area inside the curve ##r = 2a \cos(\theta)## we need to integrate ##dA## for ##r =0 \to 2 a \cos(\theta)## and for ##\theta = 0 \to \pi/2##, then multiply the result by 2 (or integrate for ##\theta = -\pi/2 \to \pi/2##).

The boundary curve ##r = 2a \cos(\theta)## has a simple form when expressed in cartesian coordinates---looking at the plot suggests what it should be. From the resulting form one can easily determine the interior area with essentially no work.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ray Vickson said:
In polar coordinates the area element is ##dA = r \, dr \, d \theta##. To get the area inside the curve ##r = 2a \cos(\theta)## we need to integrate ##dA## for ##r =0 \to 2 a \cos(\theta)## and for ##\theta = 0 \to \pi/2##, then multiply the result by 2 (or integrate for ##\theta = -\pi/2 \to \pi/2##).

The boundary curve ##r = 2a \cos(\theta)## has a simple form when expressed in cartesian coordinates---looking at the plot suggests what it should be. From the resulting form one can easily determine the interior area with essentially no work.

we begin at ##θ=0##, why should ##r=0## ?, logicaly ##r=2acosθ## give us ##r=2a## !
the thing is, ##r## is the distance between the point and the origin and ##θ## is the angle between r and x-axis !

I don't know how did you do it but! the limits you suggest were wrong "both limit from ##-π/2## to ##π/2## and ##0## to ##π/2## multiplied by ## 2##" give an answer of## = 2πa^2##, which is double the area we expect.

Thank you.
 
ahmed markhoos said:
we begin at ##θ=0##, why should ##r=0## ?, logicaly ##r=2acosθ## give us ##r=2a## !
the thing is, ##r## is the distance between the point and the origin and ##θ## is the angle between r and x-axis !

I don't know how did you do it but! the limits you suggest were wrong "both limit from ##-π/2## to ##π/2## and ##0## to ##π/2## multiplied by ## 2##" give an answer of## = 2πa^2##, which is double the area we expect.

Thank you.

Look at the picture! For a given value of ##\theta##, ##r## starts at ##r = 0## and ends at ##r = 2a \cos(\theta)##.

My limits are not wrong, and when I do the integration I get an area of exactly ##2 \times \pi a^2/2 = \pi a^2## in the ##0 \to \pi/2## case and ##\pi a^2## directly in the ##-\pi/2 \to \pi/2## case. Yes, I have done the integrations, and that is what I get!

Please re-read what I said in post #2. There I told you exactly what integrations I performed, and they are not at all the same as the ones you did.
 
but the computer gave me solutions different than yours
look

http://im50.gulfup.com/rtRHjt.png

http://im50.gulfup.com/lL8Idy.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ahmed markhoos said:
but the computer gave me solutions different than yours
look

http://im50.gulfup.com/rtRHjt.png

http://im50.gulfup.com/lL8Idy.png
Those are not the correct integrals; they do not represent the area you want. Again: re-read (carefully!) what I wrote; or else, look up the topic in a book or via Google.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes ahmed markhoos
Ray Vickson said:
Those are not the correct integrals; they do not represent the area you want. Again: re-read (carefully!) what I wrote; or else, look up the topic in a book or via Google.

Got it!, thank you. But can I ask another question ?

why can't I substitute ##r=2a cos(θ)## in the integral?, I did it because it seems reasonable in an integral. I mean since r depend on θ, then I can't integrate ##2a cos(θ)## which is in ##r## with respect to r because it contain a constant!. All that doesn't matter, still the question is why I can't substitute with the value of r ?

is it because the disk is represented by ##r ≤ 2a cos(θ)## ??
 
Last edited:
ahmed markhoos said:
Got it!, thank you. But can I ask another question ?

why can't I substitute ##r=2a cos(θ)## in the integral?, I did it because it seems reasonable in an integral. I mean since r depend on θ, then I can't integrate ##2a cos(θ)## which is in ##r## with respect to r because it contain a constant!. All that doesn't matter, still the question is why I can't substitute with the value of r ?

is it because the disk is represented by ##r ≤ 2a cos(θ)## ??

Basically, yes.

I did suggest you look up the topic in Google. Have you done that? You should; there are several nice articles with derivations, diagrams, worked examples, etc. All your questions will be answered there.
 
  • Like
Likes ahmed markhoos

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K