Area in polar coordinate using multiple integral

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the area of a disk defined by the polar equation r ≤ 2a×cos(θ). Participants explore different integration methods and limits to calculate the area, while also addressing a related question about the volume of a flipped cone.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants describe attempts to integrate using different limits and methods, noting discrepancies in results. Questions arise regarding the appropriateness of integration limits and the interpretation of the polar equation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of integration methods, with some participants expressing confusion over the limits and the results obtained. Guidance has been offered regarding the setup of integrals, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information available for solving the problems. The discussion includes questioning the validity of assumptions regarding the integration limits and the representation of the area in polar coordinates.

ahmed markhoos
Messages
49
Reaction score
2
The question is to find the area of a disk, r ≤ 2a×cos(θ)
as in the figure "example-just an illustration"

yvLb1.png
I used two methods, each gave different wrong answers

- integrate 2a×cos(θ) dθ dr - from θ=0 to θ=π/2 and from r=2a to r=2a×cos(θ) ; then I simply multiplied the answer by 2.

- integrate 2a×cos(θ) dθ dr - from θ=0 to θ=2π and from r=2a to r=2a×cos(θ)

I was hopping to get the right answer using the first method, but surprisingly it didn't work, integration seems to be fine I even used wolfram to check it.

-----------------

I have another small question. I had a question about finding the volume of flipped cone "its point in the origin and its shape is in the positive side of z-axis", its height is the same as its base radius so that, r=h z=h, thus r=z
"example-just an illustration"

http://01.edu-cdn.com/files/static/mcgrawhillprof/9780071624756/INVERTED_CONE_WATER_TANK_PROBLEM_01.GIF

thing is, when I put the limits say : r=0 ⇒ h //// z=0 ⇒ r //// θ=0 ⇒ 2π . It give wrong answer

but r=0 ⇒ z //// z=0 ⇒ h //// θ=0 ⇒ 2π . give the right one

that's really confusing!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ahmed markhoos said:
The question is to find the area of a disk, r ≤ 2a×cos(θ)
as in the figure "example-just an illustration"

yvLb1.png
I used two methods, each gave different wrong answers

- integrate 2a×cos(θ) dθ dr - from θ=0 to θ=π/2 and from r=2a to r=2a×cos(θ) ; then I simply multiplied the answer by 2.

- integrate 2a×cos(θ) dθ dr - from θ=0 to θ=2π and from r=2a to r=2a×cos(θ)

I was hopping to get the right answer using the first method, but surprisingly it didn't work, integration seems to be fine I even used wolfram to check it.
I have another small question. I had a question about finding the volume of flipped cone "its point in the origin and its shape is in the positive side of z-axis", its height is the same as its base radius so that, r=h z=h, thus r=z
"example-just an illustration"

http://01.edu-cdn.com/files/static/mcgrawhillprof/9780071624756/INVERTED_CONE_WATER_TANK_PROBLEM_01.GIF

thing is, when I put the limits say : r=0 ⇒ h //// z=0 ⇒ r //// θ=0 ⇒ 2π . It give wrong answer

but r=0 ⇒ z //// z=0 ⇒ h //// θ=0 ⇒ 2π . give the right one

that's really confusing!

In polar coordinates the area element is ##dA = r \, dr \, d \theta##. To get the area inside the curve ##r = 2a \cos(\theta)## we need to integrate ##dA## for ##r =0 \to 2 a \cos(\theta)## and for ##\theta = 0 \to \pi/2##, then multiply the result by 2 (or integrate for ##\theta = -\pi/2 \to \pi/2##).

The boundary curve ##r = 2a \cos(\theta)## has a simple form when expressed in cartesian coordinates---looking at the plot suggests what it should be. From the resulting form one can easily determine the interior area with essentially no work.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ray Vickson said:
In polar coordinates the area element is ##dA = r \, dr \, d \theta##. To get the area inside the curve ##r = 2a \cos(\theta)## we need to integrate ##dA## for ##r =0 \to 2 a \cos(\theta)## and for ##\theta = 0 \to \pi/2##, then multiply the result by 2 (or integrate for ##\theta = -\pi/2 \to \pi/2##).

The boundary curve ##r = 2a \cos(\theta)## has a simple form when expressed in cartesian coordinates---looking at the plot suggests what it should be. From the resulting form one can easily determine the interior area with essentially no work.

we begin at ##θ=0##, why should ##r=0## ?, logicaly ##r=2acosθ## give us ##r=2a## !
the thing is, ##r## is the distance between the point and the origin and ##θ## is the angle between r and x-axis !

I don't know how did you do it but! the limits you suggest were wrong "both limit from ##-π/2## to ##π/2## and ##0## to ##π/2## multiplied by ## 2##" give an answer of## = 2πa^2##, which is double the area we expect.

Thank you.
 
ahmed markhoos said:
we begin at ##θ=0##, why should ##r=0## ?, logicaly ##r=2acosθ## give us ##r=2a## !
the thing is, ##r## is the distance between the point and the origin and ##θ## is the angle between r and x-axis !

I don't know how did you do it but! the limits you suggest were wrong "both limit from ##-π/2## to ##π/2## and ##0## to ##π/2## multiplied by ## 2##" give an answer of## = 2πa^2##, which is double the area we expect.

Thank you.

Look at the picture! For a given value of ##\theta##, ##r## starts at ##r = 0## and ends at ##r = 2a \cos(\theta)##.

My limits are not wrong, and when I do the integration I get an area of exactly ##2 \times \pi a^2/2 = \pi a^2## in the ##0 \to \pi/2## case and ##\pi a^2## directly in the ##-\pi/2 \to \pi/2## case. Yes, I have done the integrations, and that is what I get!

Please re-read what I said in post #2. There I told you exactly what integrations I performed, and they are not at all the same as the ones you did.
 
but the computer gave me solutions different than yours
look

http://im50.gulfup.com/rtRHjt.png

http://im50.gulfup.com/lL8Idy.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ahmed markhoos said:
but the computer gave me solutions different than yours
look

http://im50.gulfup.com/rtRHjt.png

http://im50.gulfup.com/lL8Idy.png
Those are not the correct integrals; they do not represent the area you want. Again: re-read (carefully!) what I wrote; or else, look up the topic in a book or via Google.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ahmed markhoos
Ray Vickson said:
Those are not the correct integrals; they do not represent the area you want. Again: re-read (carefully!) what I wrote; or else, look up the topic in a book or via Google.

Got it!, thank you. But can I ask another question ?

why can't I substitute ##r=2a cos(θ)## in the integral?, I did it because it seems reasonable in an integral. I mean since r depend on θ, then I can't integrate ##2a cos(θ)## which is in ##r## with respect to r because it contain a constant!. All that doesn't matter, still the question is why I can't substitute with the value of r ?

is it because the disk is represented by ##r ≤ 2a cos(θ)## ??
 
Last edited:
ahmed markhoos said:
Got it!, thank you. But can I ask another question ?

why can't I substitute ##r=2a cos(θ)## in the integral?, I did it because it seems reasonable in an integral. I mean since r depend on θ, then I can't integrate ##2a cos(θ)## which is in ##r## with respect to r because it contain a constant!. All that doesn't matter, still the question is why I can't substitute with the value of r ?

is it because the disk is represented by ##r ≤ 2a cos(θ)## ??

Basically, yes.

I did suggest you look up the topic in Google. Have you done that? You should; there are several nice articles with derivations, diagrams, worked examples, etc. All your questions will be answered there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ahmed markhoos

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K