MHB Area of Triangle ABC: Find the Answer Here

  • Thread starter Thread starter ketanco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Triangle
AI Thread Summary
The area of triangle ABC is confirmed to be 18. A participant discusses the relationship between the areas of triangles ACD and ABD, noting that ACD's area is three times that of ABD. Suggestions are made to extend line AC to point E, creating a similarity between triangles ACD and ECB. The conversation includes geometric coordinates and calculations to support the findings. Overall, the thread focuses on determining the area of triangle ABC through geometric relationships.
ketanco
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
what is the area of triangle ABC in the attached? answer is 18

i can not construct any similar triangles here. all i can see is area of ACD is 3 times area of ABD but how does it help me...
View attachment 8598
 

Attachments

  • 06-4.jpg
    06-4.jpg
    17.1 KB · Views: 87
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ketanco said:
what is the area of triangle ABC in the attached? answer is 18

i can not construct any similar triangles here. all i can see is area of ACD is 3 times area of ABD but how does it help me...

How about extending AC to E such that ACD is similar to ECB?

[TIKZ]
\def\x{sqrt(265)/4}
\def\gamma{atan2(3,16)}
\coordinate[label=above:A] (A) at ({4*\x - 12 * cos(\gamma)},{12 * sin(\gamma)});
\coordinate[label=left:B] (B) at (0,0);
\coordinate[label=right:C] (C) at ({4*\x},0);
\coordinate[label=below:D] (D) at ({\x},0);
\coordinate[label=above:E] (E) at ({4*\x - 16 * cos(\gamma)},{16 * sin(\gamma)});

\draw[rotate={270-\gamma}] (A) +(0.4,0) -- +(0.4,0.4) -- +(0,0.4);
\draw[rotate={270-\gamma}] (E) +(0.4,0) -- +(0.4,0.4) -- +(0,0.4);

\draw (C) -- node[above] {12} (A) -- node[above left] {5} (B);
\draw (A) -- (D);
\draw (A) -- (E) -- (B);
\path (B) -- node[below] {$x$} (D) -- node[below] {$3x$} (C);
\draw[blue, ultra thick] (A) -- (B) -- (C) -- cycle;
[/TIKZ]
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
How about extending AC to E such that ACD is similar to ECB?

[TIKZ]
\def\x{sqrt(265)/4}
\def\gamma{atan2(3,16)}
\coordinate[label=above:A] (A) at ({4*\x - 12 * cos(\gamma)},{12 * sin(\gamma)});
\coordinate[label=left:B] (B) at (0,0);
\coordinate[label=right:C] (C) at ({4*\x},0);
\coordinate[label=below:D] (D) at ({\x},0);
\coordinate[label=above:E] (E) at ({4*\x - 16 * cos(\gamma)},{16 * sin(\gamma)});

\draw[rotate={270-\gamma}] (A) +(0.4,0) -- +(0.4,0.4) -- +(0,0.4);
\draw[rotate={270-\gamma}] (E) +(0.4,0) -- +(0.4,0.4) -- +(0,0.4);

\draw (C) -- node[above] {12} (A) -- node[above left] {5} (B);
\draw (A) -- (D);
\draw (A) -- (E) -- (B);
\path (B) -- node[below] {$x$} (D) -- node[below] {$3x$} (C);
\draw[blue, ultra thick] (A) -- (B) -- (C) -- cycle;
[/TIKZ]
i see... thanks !
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top