As the ball roles down the hill

  • Thread starter Thread starter madmarwick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Hill
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of a ball rolling down a hill, specifically its speed and acceleration. Participants debate whether the speed increases and acceleration decreases, or if both parameters behave differently under certain conditions. Chris initially suggests that if the hill has a constant gradient, the correct answer is that speed increases while acceleration decreases. However, he later acknowledges the influence of losses, confirming that option 'a' is correct. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering both the hill's gradient and potential energy losses in the analysis.
madmarwick
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
a. Its speed increases and acceleration decreases
b. Its speed decreases and acceleration increases
c. Both increase
d. Both remain constant
e. Both decrease

Can anyone help with this little problem please?

I'm new to this forum thing. So any advice on etiquette would be appreciated.

Regards, Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you need to provide your attempt first.

The answer I want isn't there if we're assuming no losses, so I take it we're to include losses in the question?
 
jarednjames said:
Well you need to provide your attempt first.

The answer I want isn't there if we're assuming no losses, so I take it we're to include losses in the question?

Hi Jared, thanks for the reply. These were my initial thoughts:

"If the hill is at a constant gradient I think the answer would be 'a' (Its speed increases and acceleration decreases) as acceleration will reach a maximum and then start to decrease and the ball will reach constant velocity.

If the hill's gradient decreases as it reaches the bottom then I think the answer would be 'a' then 'b' as velocity would increase first and acceleration decrease then as gradient fell acceleration would increase negatively (deceleration) and velocity would decrease."

I'm very rusty so I may have it cmpletely wrong.

Chris
 
So it looks like we're using losses.

In which case, A is correct for the reason you gave.
 
Thanks Jared
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top