How to Solve asinx + bcosx = c: Understanding the Procedure and Limitations

  • Thread starter physior
  • Start date
In summary: However, if you need a negative value, or a positive value greater than 360, use that.In summary, to solve asinx + bcosx = c with any real numbers a, b, and c, we can use the sum formula for sin(x+w). However, this formula may not always be valid due to the restriction that a^2 + b^2 = 1. By defining R = root of a^2 + b^2, we can find the value of w by using arccos(a/R) or arcsin(b/R). When using a calculator to find the value of w, any of the possible values can be used, depending on the specific needs of the problem.
  • #1
physior
182
1
hello!

I would like to know how to solve asinx + bcosx = c, with a, b, c being any real numbers (constants)

First, are there any limitations for the above to be valid?

Second, I was introduced to a solution but I cannot fully understand the procedure.

Let's say we have asinx + bcosx = c
We can solve this by using:
R= root of a^2 plus b^2
and
asinx + bcosx = Rsin(x+w)
and
tan(w)=b over a

the first question is, do the above are valid for a, b being either positive or negative?

Second, when we find the "w" using the calculator (by inversing its tan), how do we find which exactly value of w we must use?

Third, when we inverse the sin(x+w), by the calculator, how do we find which exactly values of x+w we must use?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That comes from the "sum formula" that says that [tex]sin(x+ w)= sin(x)cos(w)+ cos(x)sin(w)[/tex]. If we are given asin(x)+ bcos(x), comparing to the previous formula, we would like to have a= cos(w) and b= sin(w). But that is not always possible, because that would require that [itex]a^2+ b^2= cos^2(w)+ sin^2(w)= 1[/itex] which is of course, not always true! But if we define [itex]R= \sqrt{a^2+ b^2}[/itex] we can "multiply and divide" by R: [itex]asin(x)+ bcos(x)= R((a/R)sin(x)+ (b/R)cos(x))[/itex] and now [itex](a/R)^2+ (b/R)^2= \frac{a^2+ b^2}{R^2}= \frac{a^2+ b^2}{a^2+ b^2}= 1[/itex]. So we can say [itex]cos(w)= a/R[/itex] and [itex]sin(w)= b/R[/itex] so that [itex]w= arccos(a/R)= arcsin(b/R)[/itex]. Or, since [itex]cos(w)= a/R[/itex] and [itex]sin(w)= b/R[/itex], [itex]tan(w)= sin(w)/cos(w)= (b/R)/(a/R)= b/a.[/itex].

You ask: "when we find the "w" using the calculator (by inversing its tan), how do we find which exactly value of w we must use?"
Any if the values can be used. Use whichever fits your needs. Typically, that is the smallest positive value just because it is simplest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is the procedure for solving asinx + bcosx = c?

The first step is to rewrite the equation in the form of asinx + bcosx = rcos(x + α), where r is the magnitude of the vector (a, b) and α is the angle it makes with the x-axis. Next, use the identity sin(x + α) = sinxcosα + cosxsinα to simplify the equation to rcos(x + α) = c. Then, solve for x by taking the inverse cosine of both sides and adding or subtracting 2π as needed to find all possible solutions.

2. Are there any limitations to using this procedure?

Yes, this procedure only works for equations of the form asinx + bcosx = c. It will not work for equations with different trigonometric functions or multiple trigonometric terms. Additionally, it may not yield solutions for certain values of a, b, and c, such as when r > |c| or when r = 0 and c ≠ 0.

3. Can this procedure be used for solving any type of trigonometric equation?

No, this procedure is specifically designed for solving equations of the form asinx + bcosx = c. It will not work for equations with different trigonometric functions or multiple trigonometric terms.

4. Is there a way to check if the solutions obtained using this procedure are correct?

Yes, you can substitute the values of x into the original equation and see if it satisfies the equation. Also, you can graph both sides of the equation and see if they intersect at the solutions obtained.

5. Are there any alternative methods for solving asinx + bcosx = c?

Yes, there are other methods such as using trigonometric identities, converting to exponential form, or using a graphing calculator to find the intersection points. However, the procedure outlined above is the most common and straightforward method for solving this type of equation.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
535
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
945
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
640
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
304
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
517
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
769
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top