MHB [ASK] How much velocity is needed for the rock to be able to hit that bird?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the velocity needed for a rock shot from a slingshot at a 37-degree angle to hit a bird at coordinates (50, 8) m, the equations of motion were applied. After substituting known variables, the time of flight was calculated to be approximately 2.43 seconds. This led to the equation for horizontal distance, resulting in a required initial velocity of about 25.8 m/s. The discussion highlights the challenge of working with irrational numbers in calculations. The complexity arises from the need to accurately approximate these values in the context of projectile motion.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
A bird is located at the (50, 8 ) m coordinate. A boy shot a rock at it using a slingshot with the elevation angle $$37^{\circ}$$. How much velocity is needed for the rock to be able to hit that bird?

I substituted all known variables (including the gravity acceleration $$10m/s^2$$, with $$\sin37^{\circ}=\frac{3}{5}$$ and $$\cos37^{\circ}=\frac{4}{5}$$) to $$x=v_0\cos\alpha t$$ and $$y=v_0\sin\alpha t-\frac{1}{2}gt^2$$. Substituting the $$v_0$$ I got from both equations resulted in $$\frac{125}{2t}=\frac{40+25t^2}{3t}$$ and I got $$t^2=5,9$$. Am I right? Because if it is indeed the right value of t, everything will be complicated from there.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is correct and then t= \sqrt{5.9}= 2.43 (to two decimal places). But why do things "get complicated"? You have x= 50= v_0 cos(37)(2.43)= 1.94 v_0. v_0= 50/1.94= 25.8 m/s.
 
Country Boy said:
But why do things "get complicated"?

Probably just because I'm not used to the approximation of irrational numbers.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top