MHB [ASK]Show that the sum of the fifth powers of these numbers is divisible by 5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the sum of the fifth powers of ten integers, which sum to zero, is divisible by 5. Fermat's Little Theorem is applied, stating that for any integer a, a^5 is congruent to a modulo 5. This implies that the sum of the fifth powers of the integers is congruent to the sum of the integers themselves modulo 5. Since the sum of the integers is zero, it follows that the sum of their fifth powers is also zero modulo 5, confirming divisibility by 5. The key takeaway is that the condition of the integers summing to zero is crucial for the proof.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
The sum of ten integers is 0. Show that the sum of the fifth powers of these numbers is divisible by 5.

For this one I don't know what I have to do at all other than brute-forcing which may even be impossible.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Monoxdifly said:
The sum of ten integers is 0. Show that the sum of the fifth powers of these numbers is divisible by 5.

For this one I don't know what I have to do at all other than brute-forcing which may even be impossible.

Hi Monoxdifly,

The number of integers does not matter. This would be a great time to use Fermat's Little Theorem : for any integer $a$, $a^5\equiv a\pmod5$, since $5$ is prime.
 
castor28 said:
Hi Monoxdifly,

The number of integers does not matter. This would be a great time to use Fermat's Little Theorem : for any integer $a$, $a^5\equiv a\pmod5$, since $5$ is prime.

So you mean that it applies to any number? That "The sum of ten integers is 0" is just a distraction, then?
 
Monoxdifly said:
So you mean that it applies to any number? That "The sum of ten integers is 0" is just a distraction, then?
Hi Monoxdifly,

The distraction is the fact that there are ten integers. The fact that the sum is $0$ is essential.

More precisely, if the integers are $a, b, c, \ldots$, Fermat's theorem tells us that $a^5\equiv a, b^5\equiv b\ldots\pmod5$.

We have therefore $a^5 + b^5 + \cdots\equiv a + b + \cdots\pmod 5$. As we are told that $a + b +\cdots=0\equiv0\pmod5$, we conclude that $a^5 + b^5 + \cdots\equiv0\pmod5$, which means that the sum is divisible by $5$.
 
I think I kinda get a grasp here. Thanks for your help.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top