Asking For Detailed Integrals Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tales Roberto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the evaluation of integrals involving square roots in the denominator, specifically focusing on integrals of the form \(\int \frac{1}{\sqrt{s^2 + z^2}} dz\) and \(\int \frac{u}{\sqrt{R^2 + r^2 + 2Rru}} du\). Participants are exploring various substitution methods and transformations to simplify these integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different substitution techniques, such as using trigonometric and hyperbolic functions, to evaluate the integrals. There are attempts to clarify whether differing forms of solutions can be equivalent. Some participants question the correctness of the original poster's approach and suggest alternative methods.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing various insights and suggestions for substitutions. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach, but several productive directions have been offered, including simplifications and alternative substitutions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential issues with variable substitutions and the need for clarity regarding the roles of constants and variables in the integrals. There are also mentions of typographical errors in the integral expressions that could affect the discussion.

Tales Roberto
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I would like a detailed solution of following Integrals:

[tex]\int^{z_{2}}_{z_{1}} 1/ \left(s^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{1/2} dz[/tex]


Homework Equations




[tex]1+tan^{2} \theta = sec^{2} \theta[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\int 1/ \left(s^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{1/2} dz = \int 1/ \left[s\left(1+ \left(z/s \right)^{2}\right)^{1/2} \right] dz[/tex]

Let

[tex]z = s \tan \theta \rightarrow dz = s \sec^{2} \theta d \theta[/tex]
[tex]\theta = tg^{-1} \left(z/s\right)[/tex]

Then

[tex]\int^{z_{2}}_{z_{1}} 1/ \left[s\left(1+ \left(z/s \right)^{2}\right)^{1/2} \right] dz = \int^{\theta_{2}}_{\theta_{1}} s \sec^{2} \theta/ \left[s\left(1+tan^{2} \theta \right)^{1/2} \right] d\theta[/tex]

[tex]\int^{\theta_{2}}_{\theta_{1}} s \sec^{2}\theta / \left[s \sec \theta \right] d\theta = \int^{tg^{-1} \left(z_{2}/s\right)}_{tg^{-1} \left(z_{1}/s\right)} sec \theta d \theta[/tex]

However this not give me the answer i need here (i checked final solution):

[tex]\int^{z_{1}}_{z_{2}} 1/ \left(s^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{1/2} dz = \left[ln\left(z^{2}+\sqrt{z^{2}+s^{2}\right)}\right]\right|^{z_{2}}_{z_{1}}[/tex]


Please, help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Another one:

[tex]\int u/ \left(R^{2}+r^{2}+2Rru\right)^{1/2} du[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Are you sure that's not a correct answer? Just because your solution looks different doesn't mean it's not the same!

For instance, note that the hyperbolic trig function sinh and cosh satisfy

[tex]1 + \sinh^2x = \cosh^2x[/tex],

so you could just as well make the substitution [itex]z = s\sinh\theta[/itex]. Your answer would then be in terms of an inverse hyperbolic function - which can be expressed in terms of a logarithm. I would suspect that's why your answer doesn't match what you looked up.

Edit: this refers to the integral in the first post.

Also, if you want to do fractions, you use: \frac{numerator}{denominator}
Just be careful with the sqiggly brackets when doing complex fractions, as missing just one of those tends to completely ruin the output (my latex pdf compiler won't even compile anything if that happens)
 
you can simplify s sec^2 theta/ s sec theta into
[tex] \int^{\theta_{2}}_{\theta_{1}} \sec \theta \right] d\theta [/tex]
which equals ln|sec(theta) + tan(theta)|, and then reverse substitute the z.
 
Tales Roberto said:
Another one:

[tex]\int 1/ \left(R^{2}+r^{2}+2Rru\right)^{1/2} dz[/tex]

Since you are integrating with respect to z, and assuming that R, r, and u are not functions of z, what you have there is the integral of a constant. It doesn't matter that the constant is complicated by having a radical in the denominator.

In other words,
[tex] \int \frac{dz}{K} = \frac{1}{K}z + C[/tex]

On the other hand, if this is what you got after doing a substitution, then you didn't go far enough, since you have both u and dz. When you do a substitution, your new integral should not have any of the old variables in it, including the differential.
 
Sorry, i made a typing mistake here, the integral is:

[tex]\int u/ \left(R^{2}+r^{2}+2Rru\right)^{1/2} du[/tex]
 
Last edited:
zcd said:
you can simplify s sec^2 theta/ s sec theta into
[tex]\int^{\theta_{2}}_{\theta_{1}} \sec \theta \right] d\theta[/tex]
which equals ln|sec(theta) + tan(theta)|, and then reverse substitute the z.

I cannot deal with arctg z in the argument of sec ( ). Its necessary to my purpose find a solution without arctg or sec ( ). However Mute's suggestion would be usefull, i ll try this one and made another attempt.
 
Tales Roberto said:
Sorry, i made a typing mistake here, the integral is:

[tex]\int u/ \left(R^{2}+r^{2}+2Rru\right)^{1/2} du[/tex]

I would start with this substitution: w = R2 + r2 + 2Rru. Another one I would try if the first one didn't get me anywhere is w = (R2 + r2 + 2Rru)^(1/2)
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K