Aspect's experiment, bell's inequality, neutrino faster than 'c'.

sg001
Messages
134
Reaction score
0
Hi just a quick question I was curious about.
Im not sure if the results from CERN about the faster than light neutrino have been verified, but given that this is true...
as I understand it bell's inequality assumes
1. the reality of the external world, independent of us "observers".
2. locality, ie, no faster than light signalling.
The results of Aspects experiment say that one of these has to go?
Assuming that the results from CERN were correct, what are the implications of this??
Does this mean things can go backwards in time??
If we were to go back to the idea of an aether does this solve some of the implications??
Im not in the field (although I am studying at an undergrad level) so a laypersons description as much as possible is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To bring things down to earth, the OPERA experiment (CERN) seems to have had a problem with a faulty cable.
 
Ohh so the results don't seem to be reliable?
 
Thanks for the update mathman!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top