Assessing Modulation Index in AM Demodulation: Techniques and Limitations

  • Thread starter Thread starter watertreader
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on techniques for assessing the modulation index in AM demodulation. Two primary demodulation methods are identified: synchronous detection and envelope detection. The proposed techniques for measuring the modulation index include using FFT to analyze the spectrum height at the modulation frequency or calculating the difference between the maximum and minimum signal values over time. Concerns are raised about the limitations of these methods, particularly their effectiveness in low-frequency and low-distortion scenarios. The discussion concludes with a consideration of the ideal conditions necessary for these techniques to yield accurate results.
watertreader
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
hi,

Just want to have some comments on the AM Demodulation steps that I have taken.

A AM modulated signal is given by AM(t) = DC + m cos(wt)

For the general demodulation technique, I understand there is two general form - (i) Synchronous Detection whereby you mix the input wave with an local oscillator signal or in more advance form by using a 90 degree phase delay signal to get the quadrature as well (ii) Envelope detector - wherby we will just detect the envelope of the input with an diode and cap.

Now if we would just want to have the knowledge of the modulation index instead of recovering the whole wave. I am thinking of the following method

1) compute the FFT of the signal and measure the spectrum height at the modulation frequency (as a representative value of modulation)
Or
2) Compute the difference between the maximum and minimum signal off the signal at time axis

Would this be appropriate? I can only think of the problems would be that both techniques usage would be restricted to low frequency and low distortion cases.

Like to have your comments

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Technically, I am trying to find M only. I am just wondering if my technique has any other drawbacks or whether would it be sufficient

1) Using FFT method essentially separate the A and M. A is in the DC while M or rather M/2 is sited with the modulated signal frequency

2) Using the subtraction method, effectively I cancel out A... What is left is the M index...

That is assuming the condition are pretty ideal.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top