Asteroid close encounter: speed at perigee

  • Thread starter Thread starter rickyjoepr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid Speed
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of an asteroid at its closest point to Earth, which is initially 7.25 km/s as it passes the moon's orbit. The professor's solution indicates the speed should be 11.0 km/s, but the user struggles with their calculations, yielding incorrect results. The key issue identified is the need to use meters instead of kilometers for distance and velocity in the calculations, as the gravitational constant G operates in the M.K.S. system. The user learns that after converting units appropriately, they can solve for the final speed correctly. This exchange highlights the importance of unit consistency in physics calculations.
rickyjoepr
Messages
6
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


an asteroid heading towards earth, has a speed of 7.25 km/s as it passes the moons orbit, kit misses Earth by 5000km. What is the speed at the closest point to earth?

The professor provided us with the solution, which should be 11.0 km/s, however when I do the calculation, using the given values, my number is way off.

Is there a conversion I should be doing that I may not know about?

Homework Equations


Conservation of energy for an asteroid is
(.5) mVi^2-((GmMearth)/Ri) = (.5) mVf^2-((GmM_earth)/Rf)

The Attempt at a Solution


Vi = 7.25 km/s

Ri = distance from the moon to Earth = 384,000km
Rf = radius of Earth + 5000km = 11400km
Mearth =5.972x10^24

G = 6.67384x10^-11

solve for Vf

Vf = SQRT[ Vi^2 + 2GMearth ((1/Rf)-(1/Ri))] = 260475.0801
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rickyjoepr said:

Homework Statement


an asteroid heading towards earth, has a speed of 7.25 km/s as it passes the moons orbit, kit misses Earth by 5000km. What is the speed at the closest point to earth?

The professor provided us with the solution, which should be 11.0 km/s, however when I do the calculation, using the given values, my number is way off.

Is there a conversion I should be doing that I may not know about?

Homework Equations


Conservation of energy for an asteroid is
(.5) mVi^2-((GmMearth)/Ri) = (.5) mVf^2-((GmM_earth)/Rf)

The Attempt at a Solution


Vi = 7.25 km/s

Ri = distance from the moon to Earth = 384,000km
Rf = radius of Earth + 5000km = 11400km
Mearth =5.972x10^24

G = 6.67384x10^-11

solve for Vf

Vf = SQRT[ Vi^2 + 2GMearth ((1/Rf)-(1/Ri))] = 260475.0801
In your formulas, you use kilograms which is correct, but you need to use meters and not kilometers for distance as well as velocity (m/sec). The constant ## G ## works in meters, and the energy it computes works in m/sec. Once you solve for ## v_f ## in m/sec, you can then convert it back to km/sec.
 
  • Like
Likes rickyjoepr
Charles Link said:
In your formulas, you use kilograms which is correct, but you need to use meters and not kilometers for distance as well as velocity (m/sec). The constant ## G ## works in meters, and the energy it computes works in m/sec. Once you solve for ## v_f ## in m/sec, you can then convert it back to km/sec.

I thought it was an issue with G, I was trying to convert G to km , but I will try what you suggested

edit: and even if i dd convert G to km, it would still be wrong as the kg Mass of Earth must work with m/s
 
rickyjoepr said:
I thought it was an issue with G, I was trying to convert G to km , but I will try what you suggested
The energy that your equation ## U=-GMm/r ## computes is in joules, so it is much easier to work with ## G ## in the M.K.S. system as is, and simply convert the velocities and distances, and convert ## v_f ## back at the end to km/sec.
 
Charles Link said:
The energy that your equation ## U=-GMm/r ## computes is in joules, so it is much easier to work with ## G ## in the M.K.S. system as is, and simply convert the velocities and distances, and convert ## v_f ## back at the end to km/sec.

Everything worked out, I had been at that for hours, thank you for your guidance. I learned something
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top