Asteroid danger in 2014 downplayed: BBC

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid
AI Thread Summary
Astronomers have assessed that the likelihood of a newly discovered asteroid impacting Earth in 2014 is minimal, emphasizing responsible reporting while further evaluations are conducted. The media's portrayal of the asteroid has contributed to public anxiety and fear, despite the low risk. Kevin Yates's routine announcement sparked widespread concern, highlighting the challenges of communicating scientific findings to the public. The discussion also touches on the psychological aspects of fear surrounding potential global threats. Overall, the consensus is that while vigilance is necessary, the immediate danger from the asteroid is overstated.
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,194
Reaction score
2,454
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I think downplaying the possiblity until the actual level of threat can be determined, is responsible reporting.
 
Asteroid Scares: Why They Won't End: Space.com

Kevin Yates could not foresee the global media circus and public anxiety he would fuel last week with a routine Web posting about a potentially dangerous asteroid.

http://space.com/scienceastronomy/asteroid_scares_030909.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
why are people so scared of the world being destroyed by some outside force? they don't like competition?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top