Astronomy Help: Minimum Mass of Stars & Sun's Energy Production Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter karol17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two questions about stellar physics and the Sun's energy production. The minimum mass of a star, currently understood to be 0.08 solar masses, may change if helium were the primary fuel instead of hydrogen, prompting considerations of nuclear fusion processes. The Sun's luminosity, equivalent to the energy output of 3.9 x 10^24 100-watt light bulbs, raises questions about the actual energy produced per second, which is indeed equal to its luminosity. Participants clarify the relationship between watts and joules, emphasizing that a watt represents one joule per second. The conversation highlights confusion over the assignment's complexity and the need for a better understanding of fundamental concepts in astronomy.
karol17
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey
can someone help me with the followng 2 questions, i am so confuzed and have no idea how to start and what formulas to use.


1. the minimum mass of a star is 0.08 solar mass or 80 Jupiter masses. If the fuel that powered stars was helium instead of hydrogen would the minimum mass of stars be more, les or still be 0.08 sollar mass? (hint: think of the number of protons in nuclei)

2. the sun emits as much energy as 3.9 *10^24 100- Watts light-bulbs (that’s a whole lot of light bulbs!) every second. We call that number its luminosity. Give that the radius of the sun is constant in time, how much energy is produced in the Sun every second? Is it more than, less than or equal to its luminosity? Justify your answer ( no calculations necessary)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1, is a dumb question - depending on what level of course this is - are we supposed to just simply consider everything the same except the number of protons, go into the CNO cycle,conditions for direct He3 (He4) fusion or what?

2, Is this simply asking you how many J/s there are in 100W * 3.8e24 ?

Have you copied these questions down correctly or are you a victim of some stupid watered down 'modern' physics course? If so we will do our best - it's not your fault!
 
I am in an intro to astronomy course and these questions are straight from my assignment. i do not understand what any of it means so i don't even know how to go about solving them

thank you so much
 
2, A watt is one joule (energy) per second. So a 100W light bulb emits 100J/s
Work out how many Joules/s the sun emits if it has 3.9x10^24 of these light bulbs.

ps do you know what numbers like 3.9x10^24 mean?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top