Astronomy iron ratios in galaxy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the significance of [Fe/H] ratios in determining a galaxy's metallicity and what [element/Fe] ratios indicate. It highlights that normal nucleosynthesis cannot produce elements heavier than iron, which are formed during supernovae or other high-energy processes. Participants express uncertainty about the production timeline of iron and its implications for astrophysics. Additionally, a clarification is provided that in astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements except hydrogen and helium. This exchange emphasizes the complexity of stellar nucleosynthesis and its relevance to galaxy composition.
Puchinita5
Messages
178
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I understand that [Fe/H] ratios can be used to describe metallicity in a galaxy... but I'm having trouble understanding what [element/Fe] ratios should tell you.

Anyone have an idea?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any conjecture? Is there anything special about Fe that might nave to do wth it?
 
Well, I'm assuming it has something to do with the fact that normal nucleosynthesis processes can't make elements past iron (nuclear fusion consumes rather than releases energy for heavier elements than iron, so the heavier elements are made in supernova or more energetic processes)

am i heading in the right direction?
 
How long does it take to produce iron?
 
Puchinita5 said:
am i heading in the right direction?

I really don't know for sure as I am not knowledgeable about astrophysics, but it sounds a reasonable conjecture, which will help you latch on when you hear the official explanation which I hope will come here.

As this forum is for chemistry and there isn't one specifically for astronomy homework, perhaps not everyone here knows that when astronomers say 'metals' they mean every element that is not H or He. :))
I just thought you might like to know. :)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top