Astrophysics: Deriving Newton's Gravitational Formula from Kepler's

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving Newton's gravitational formula from Kepler's third law, specifically for two stars in circular orbits. The user attempts to manipulate the equations related to orbital motion, including the center of mass and period of orbit. They express confusion regarding the variable 'r' and whether to calculate it separately for each star. The derivation process involves equating centripetal force with gravitational force, ultimately leading to the formula F = GMm/r^2. The user concludes that they have made progress but acknowledges potential errors in their calculations.
knowlewj01
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Dervie Newton's form of Kepler's third law.

decrribing the orbital motion of two stars in circular orbits with masses M1 and M2, separation a, and period P

ie.

Obtain

F=\frac{ G M1 M2 }{ a^2 }

From

M1+M2=\frac{4 \pi^2 a^3 }{GP^2}

Homework Equations



Centre of mass:

M1r1 = M2r2

a = r1 + r2

P = \frac{2\pi r}{v}

The Attempt at a Solution



[not to good at this LaTeX thing so i'll wing it]

1: switch the (M1 + M2) For P^2

P^2 = (4π^2 a^3)/(G(M1 + M2))

switch the P for the term above:

(4π^2 r^2)/v^2 = (4π^2 a^3)/(G(M1 + M2))

π's cancel:

r^2/v^2 = a^3 / G(M1 + M2)

problem is here that i don't know what the r is, do i have to work out this for r1 and r2 seperatly?

anyone done this before that could point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks, I think i got it, it looks a bit eggy but i got there, there may be something wrong.

M = \frac{4\pi^2r^3}{GP^2}

P2 = \frac{4\pi^2r^3}{GM}

\frac{4\pi^2r^2}{v^2} = \frac{4\pi^2r^3}{GM}

\frac{r^2}{v^2} = \frac{r^3}{GM}

\Rightarrow acceleration = \frac{v^2}{r}

a = centrepetal acceleration

\frac{r}{a} = \frac{r^3}{GM}

a = \frac{GM}{r^2}

\Rightarrow F= ma

F = \frac{GMm}{r^2}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top