Astrophysics - tricky unit conversions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter t_n_p
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astrophysics Unit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular rotation speed of a star in the M101 (Pinwheel Galaxy) using a radius of 22.69 kpc and a velocity of 180 km/s. The user successfully derived the angular velocity in radians per year as approximately 8.11 x 10^-9 rad/year. They then converted this to arcseconds per year, arriving at a value of about 0.00167 arcsec/year, which suggests it would take roughly 600 years to rotate through 1 arcsecond. The calculation is confirmed to be in the correct order of magnitude when compared to known values, such as the Sun's revolution rate. Overall, the approach and final result are deemed accurate for the context of stellar motion in a galaxy.
t_n_p
Messages
593
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I've got a radius of 22.69kpc, and a velocity of 180km/s. I wish to find the angular rotation speed in units of arcsec/year.

I'm stuck at the moment

The Attempt at a Solution



Starting with the basic v=r\omega, I transpose to get \omega=v/r.

For now, I'm going to convert all length units to parsec, and all time units to years.

velocity = 180km/s = (5.83*10^-12)pc/s = (1.84*10^-4)pc/year
radius = 22.69kpc = 22690pc

\omega = [(1.84*10^-4)pc/year]/[22690pc] = (8.11*10^-9) yr^-1
since the units of parsec cancel

This is where I'm stuck, how do I ge the arcsec units in?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to convert from radians to degrees, and then to arcseconds (which is 1/3600 of a degree---1 arcminute is 1/60 of a degree, and 1 arcsecond is 1/60 of an arcminute)
 
Thanks for the reply.

So I'm guessing what I've done up to that point is correct?

i.e., after the parsecs cancel I actually have:

w = (8.11*10^-9) rad/yr

then I should convert to:

w = (xxxx) degrees/yr
w = (yyyy) arcsec/yr

Sound good?
 
I did the above and got an answer of:

w=0.0016712178 arcsec/year,

meaning it would take approx 600 years to rotate through 1".

I couldn't find any reference values, so just wondering if the answer sounds right (or is in the correct magnitude of some other known angular velocities)
 
I agree with the calculation. The answer makes sense if it is talking about a star orbiting in a galaxy. For comparison, our sun's revolution rate is the same order of magnitude, about 0.006 arcsec/year (based on an orbital period of 200 million years).
 
thanks for the reply.


for your information, it was a star orbiting around the m101 (pinwheel galaxy) at:
R25 (isophotal radius at 25 B-mag arcsec^-2) = 22.69kpc
Vmax (rotational velocity @ R25) = 180km/s
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top