Asymptotic expansion for Mertens function

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mhill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conjecture regarding the asymptotic behavior of the Mertens function using the Selberg-Delange method. The proposed asymptotic equality is expressed as \(\sum_{n \le N } \mu (n) \sim (\sqrt n )\log^{a}(n) \frac{G(c)}{\Gamma (b)}\), where \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\) are positive constants, with \(G(c)\) defined as \(G(c) \zeta (c) = 1\). The conjecture suggests implications for the Riemann hypothesis, indicating that the Mertens function \(M(n)\) is bounded by \(o(n^{1/2+\varepsilon})\). The discussion also touches on the behavior of the Mertens function crossing zero infinitely often.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Mertens function and its properties
  • Familiarity with the Selberg-Delange method
  • Knowledge of asymptotic analysis in number theory
  • Basic concepts of the Riemann hypothesis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Selberg-Delange method in detail
  • Study the properties and implications of the Mertens function
  • Examine the relationship between the Mertens function and the Riemann hypothesis
  • Explore asymptotic expansions in analytic number theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and researchers interested in analytic number theory and the properties of the Mertens function.

mhill
Messages
180
Reaction score
1
My conjecture is that using the Selberg-Delange method the next asymptotic equality holds

[tex]\sum_{n \le N } \mu (n) \sim (\sqrt n )log^{a}(n) \frac{G(c)}{\Gamma (b)}[/tex]

where a,b and c are positive constants and Gamma stands for (n-1)! , G(c) is just [tex]G(c) \zeta (c) =1[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's quite unlikely that the Mertens function settles down into an asymptotic equality, eljose! Hasn't some kind of result been proved to the effect that it crosses zero an infinite number of times?

Further, I think the conjecture implies the Riemann hypothesis, since it would mean that M(n) is bounded by [tex]o(n^{1/2+\varepsilon})[/tex] -- right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
970
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K