At any given instant, how fast might an electron be moving?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Potatochip911
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the speed of protons and neutrons confined within a nucleus, specifically using principles from quantum mechanics. The initial approach considers the particles as confined in a one-dimensional box, leading to a formula for minimum speed based on kinetic energy. However, the uncertainty principle is also invoked, suggesting that the standard deviation in momentum can provide insight into the particles' probable speeds. Participants clarify that the problem is not seeking minimum speed but rather the most probable speed, which relates to the uncertainty principle. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between confinement and speed is crucial in this context.
Potatochip911
Messages
317
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


This is problem 5-42 from Modern Physics by Tipler & Llewellyn. Neutrons and protons in atomic nuclei are confined within a region whose diameter is is about ##10^{-15}##m. At any given instant, how fast might an individual proton or neutron be moving?

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
##m\approxeq 1.67\times 10^{-27}kg##

Looking at this question I would assume it is a particle in a one dimensional box with length ##10^{-15}##m. Therefore we can find the minimum speed for a proton or neutron by using the equations:
(1) ##E_{kmin}=\frac{\hbar^2}{2mL^2}##
(2) ##\frac{1}{2}mv^2=E_{kmin}##

which results in ##v_{min}=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar^2}{m^2L^2}}=\frac{\hbar}{mL}##

The solution manual however uses the uncertainty principle: ##\Delta x\Delta p\approx \frac{\hbar}{2}## then assuming the particle to be non-relativistic we have ##\Delta p=m\Delta v## hence we obtain
##\Delta v=\frac{\hbar}{2m\Delta x}##

This seems incorrect to me, the question is asking how fast a proton or neutron might be moving not the uncertainty in it's speed especially considering the uncertainty principle can be stated as
##\sigma_x\sigma_p\geq \frac{\hbar}{2}## where ##\sigma_x## is the standard deviation in position and ##\sigma_p## is the standard deviation in momentum. Why would we be using symbols that are defined as standard deviations to determine the minimum speed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potatochip911 said:
This seems incorrect to me, the question is asking how fast a proton or neutron might be moving not the uncertainty in it's speed
The point of the exercise is to show that the more a particle is constrained in space, the higher the probability that it will go fast, for which you need to use the uncertainty principle.

Potatochip911 said:
especially considering the uncertainty principle can be stated as
##\sigma_x\sigma_p\geq \frac{\hbar}{2}## where ##\sigma_x## is the standard deviation in position and ##\sigma_p## is the standard deviation in momentum. Why would we be using symbols that are defined as standard deviations to determine the minimum speed?
But the problem is not asking for the minimum speed. In a sense, it is asking for for the most probable speed, of which the standard deviation is a proxy.
 
  • Like
Likes Potatochip911
DrClaude said:
The point of the exercise is to show that the more a particle is constrained in space, the higher the probability that it will go fast, for which you need to use the uncertainty principle.But the problem is not asking for the minimum speed. In a sense, it is asking for for the most probable speed, of which the standard deviation is a proxy.

Perhaps the non physics related statistics class I've taken is hindering my comprehension of this because normally the standard deviation is not a great predictor of the actual value.
 
Potatochip911 said:
Perhaps the non physics related statistics class I've taken is hindering my comprehension of this because normally the standard deviation is not a great predictor of the actual value.
Indeed. But here, the average momentum is zero, so the standard deviation will give you an idea of the possible range of momenta.
 
  • Like
Likes Potatochip911
DrClaude said:
Indeed. But here, the average momentum is zero, so the standard deviation will give you an idea of the possible range of momenta.
Ok that's interesting. Then ##\sigma_p^2=\frac{\sum(p-\overline{p})^2}{n}=\frac{\sum p^2}{n}=\frac{\sum m^2v^2}{n}=\frac{m^2}{n}\sum v^2\Longrightarrow \sigma_p=m\sqrt{\frac{\sum v^2}{n}}##

So I can see why ##\sigma_v## would make sense for an approximate speed ##v##. I managed to find a portion in my textbook where they mention that they're leaving out a factor of 1/2 for the particle in a box because they're interested in the magnitude and my answer above is off by a factor of 1/2 so this is making a lot more sense now.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top