At what angle does the normal force go to zero?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the angle θ at which the normal force between an ice cube and an overturned spherical bowl goes to zero as the cube slides down. Participants analyze the forces acting on the ice cube, using equations related to kinetic and potential energy to derive the relationship between velocity and height. A key point is the need to express the height Δh in terms of the radius r and angle θ, leading to the conclusion that h = r - r cos(θ). This geometric relationship helps clarify the calculations needed to solve the problem. The conversation concludes with a confirmation that the derived height expression is correct and aids in understanding the overall problem.
romogirl
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An ice cube is placed on top of an overturned spherical bowl of radius r, as indicated in the figure. If the ice cube slides downward from rest at the top of the bowl, at what angle θdoes it separate from the bowl? In other words, at what angle does the normal force between the ice cube and the bowl go to zero?
08-27.gif


Homework Equations


∑F=ma
ΔK=-ΔU

The Attempt at a Solution


I drew a free body diagram, with the force on the ice cube from the Earth pointed straight down and the normal force perpendicular to the surface of the globe. I then summed the forces.
ΣFy=Wy-N=mac
Based on trig, I know that Wy= cosθW = cosθmg.
Then: ac= Vt2/r and the normal force is 0. Substituting all this in I get:
cosθmg=mVt2/r
cosθ=Vt2/gr

So the next step would be to find for Vt.
ΔK =-ΔU
Kf =1/2mv2
KO = 0
Uf = 0
UO = mgr
1/2mv2 = mgr
v2 = 2gr

Plugging in this to the above:
cosθ=2gr/gr
cosθ=2
which isn't the answer.

I think I am making a mistake possibly in Uf, but I am not sure what exactly it would be. Would it be mgh, where h is the height it falls off? How would I find h then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The drop should be less than r.
 
Last edited:
romogirl said:
ΣFy=Wy-N=mac
Based on trig, I know that Wy= cosθW = cosθmg.
Then: ac= Vt2/r and the normal force is 0. Substituting all this in I get:
cosθmg=mVt2/r
cosθ=Vt2/gr

So the next step would be to find for Vt.
ΔK =-ΔU
Kf =1/2mv2
KO = 0
Uf = 0
UO = mgr

Till this point it's correct.

romogirl said:
1/2mv2 = mgr

This equation generally is correct, but it gives you the velocity of the ice cube, when it hits the ground (as the entire potential energy is converted into kinetic energy). You have to find a connectedness between the velocity of the ice cube and the height above ground depending on the angle θ.

So instead of

romogirl said:
1/2mv2 = mgr

you need a function

1/2⋅m⋅v2 = m⋅g⋅Δh(r,θ)

How could you express Δh in terms of radius r and angle θ?
 
stockzahn said:
Till this point it's correct.
This equation generally is correct, but it gives you the velocity of the ice cube, when it hits the ground (as the entire potential energy is converted into kinetic energy). You have to find a connectedness between the velocity of the ice cube and the height above ground depending on the angle θ.

So instead of
you need a function

1/2⋅m⋅v2 = m⋅g⋅Δh(r,θ)

How could you express Δh in terms of radius r and angle θ?
I made a right triangle, and I found that r-h=rcosθ, so then would h = r-rcosθ?
 
romogirl said:
I made a right triangle, and I found that r-h=rcosθ, so then would h = r-rcosθ?
I attached a picture of the drawing I made.
 

Attachments

  • Snapshot.jpg
    Snapshot.jpg
    7.1 KB · Views: 737
romogirl said:
I made a right triangle, and I found that r-h=rcosθ, so then would h = r-rcosθ?
Yes, that's it.
 
romogirl said:
I attached a picture of the drawing I made.
Looks good.
 
stockzahn said:
Looks good.
This makes so much more sense, thank you!
 
Back
Top