At what height body body escapes gravitational fields

AI Thread Summary
When a body is launched with escape velocity (11.2 km/s), it theoretically reaches a height equivalent to the Earth's radius (approximately 6400 km) before leaving the gravitational field. However, the gravitational field extends infinitely, and the gravitational potential energy diminishes with distance. The formula used for calculating height is only applicable near the Earth's surface, where gravity is approximately 9.8 m/s². For accurate calculations at greater distances, the gravitational potential energy formula PE = -GMm/r should be used, indicating that the body can escape to infinity. Escape velocity specifically refers to the speed needed to break free from Earth's gravitational influence, not the speed for horizontal orbit, which is lower at about 7.9 km/s.
mars shaw
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
When a body is fired upward with escape V (i.e 11.2 km/s) then what will be the height when the body leaves the gravitational field?
I found by using formula
2gh=Vf^2 - Vi^2 keeping vf= 0 and vi=11200m/s then I got h=6400km= radius of the earth.
Is it range of the gravitational field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no limit to the range of the gravitational field.
What you calculated was the kinetic energy an object gains from falling from a very large distance (where it's speed is zero) to the surface of the earth.
This is pretty much the definition of escape velocity.

Remember that although the gravitational field goes on forever the gravitational potential energy reaches a limit, because as you go further away the field gets weaker. So if you launch an object with enough speed then when it reaches an infinite distance it will still have some ke.
This limiting speed is the escape velocity.
 
mars shaw said:
When a body is fired upward with escape V (i.e 11.2 km/s) then what will be the height when the body leaves the gravitational field?
I found by using formula
2gh=Vf^2 - Vi^2 keeping vf= 0 and vi=11200m/s then I got h=6400km= radius of the earth.
Is it range of the gravitational field?
As mgb_phys says, there's no limit to the extent of the Earth's gravitational field. The equation you are using is only valid in regions close to the Earth's surface where the acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 m/s^2. For other distances, you need to use a different formula for the gravitational potential energy: PE = -GMm/r, where r is the distance from the Earth's center. Using that corrected expression you'll get r = ∞. (Which is no surprise, since this formula is used to calculate the escape velocity in the first place.)
 
Bob_for_short said:
No, it is the Earth radius or so. The gravitational force decreases as 1/r2.

When you throw a stone at some velocity horizontally, it falls on the ground somewhere. The distance increases with the initial velocity. At v = 11.2 km/s the distance is equal to the Earth radius so the stone cannot land because the land surface "goes down". The stone misses the planet at such and higher horizontal velocities.
Nope. 11.2 km/s is the escape speed, not the speed you need to throw a stone horizontally so that it just orbits the Earth without landing. (Given the usual assumptions of a smooth, symmetrical Earth and an unobstructed path, of course.) That speed is less by a factor of √2--about 7.9 km/s.
 
Yes, that's right. I made a mistake. This is a vertical velocity to fly away from the Earth surface R=6400 km to infinity.
 
Last edited:
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top