Athletics Question

  • Thread starter eldrick
  • Start date
  • #1
52
0
Here is a problem to get your teeth around :

It is generally believed that a 5000m time of 13'00 is ~ equivalent to a 10000m time of 27'10 ( +/- 10s ). Now, it's pretty established that the energy expended in any run is given by :

E = Distance * ( Speed )^3

For 5000m, the Energy expended is : 5000 * ( 5000/780 )^3 = 1317031 u

For 10000m, the Energy expended is : 10000 * ( 10000/1630 )^3 = 2309070 u

( A ratio difference in this case of of ~ 1.753 )

I'd be grateful if posters could like at those energy values & "see" any empirical relationship to them ( to me it looked like 3^0.5, but we need something more sophisticated than by just doubling distance the energy expended only goes up by 3^0.5 . I'm looking for a variable relationship between different distances , e.g. between 1500m & 3000m rather than a fixed ratio which doesn't work as you increase distances ).

Thanks for any help.
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
52
0
We are looking for "equivalent" performances for the main middle distance & distance track races : 800m, 1500m, 3000m.

For some guidance, it is generally reckoned that a 13'00 or a 27'10 is in ballpark of

800m : 1'43.5 +/- 1.0s

1500m : 3'31.0 +/- 2.0s

3000m : 7'30.0 +/- 5.0s
 
  • #3
1,976
265
Here is a problem to get your teeth around :

It is generally believed that a 5000m time of 13'00 is ~ equivalent to a 10000m time of 27'10 ( +/- 10s ). Now, it's pretty established that the energy expended in any run is given by :

E = Distance * ( Speed )^3
The energy expended when running is just proportional to distance, because the
resistance is approximately constant.
Even for an activity where nearly all of the power goes into overcoming air resistance,
such as cycling, the energy is only:

E = Distance * ( Speed )^2

or E = Time * ( Speed )^3
 
  • #4
52
0
Believe me, the relationship is cubic :

http://www.atm.ox.ac.uk/rowing/physics/basics.html#section5

Use that.

Try & see if an empirical relationship using cubic relationship for energy &/or the suggested range of times above is obvious ( Maple or Mathematica ? Or just plain intuition/"eureka" moment )

Many Thanks
 

Related Threads on Athletics Question

  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
592
Top