Atom charge after ionizing (nuclei/particle) radiation

AI Thread Summary
When an unstable atom undergoes alpha decay, it emits a helium nucleus, resulting in a loss of two protons and changing the atom's overall charge, but it does not become ionized since the emitted particles do not affect the remaining atom's electron configuration. In beta decay, a neutron converts into a proton, increasing the atomic number and producing a beta particle, but again, this process conserves charge and does not lead to ionization of the atom. The energies involved in these nuclear reactions are significantly higher (MeV) than those in atomic phenomena (eV or keV), meaning atomic electrons are not influenced during these decays. Therefore, the remaining atom's charge changes, but it does not remain an ion due to the nature of the emitted particles. Understanding these processes clarifies the relationship between nuclear decay and atomic charge.
n124122
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When an instable atom emits alpha or beta particles. Doesn't the overal electrical charge of the remaining atom change? For example when an atom emits alpha decay, a helium core is emitted, this results in the lose of two protons (forthe radiating atom). But doens't this mean the atom became an ion, because it has 2 elektrons 'to much' (more than protons). And when it emits beta radiation. It forms an extra proton, so doesn't this make the atom a positive ion? And when this happens, does the atom remain an ion or??

Homework Equations


701.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea:wink:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
n124122 said:
When an instable atom emits alpha or beta particles. Doesn't the overal electrical charge of the remaining atom change? For example when an atom emits alpha decay, a helium core is emitted, this results in the lose of two protons (forthe radiating atom). But doens't this mean the atom became an ion, because it has 2 elektrons 'to much' (more than protons). And when it emits beta radiation. It forms an extra proton, so doesn't this make the atom a positive ion? And when this happens, does the atom remain an ion or??

in alpha deacay the parent say 238U goes to thorium the daughter nucleus and an alpha particle -in this the charge and particle number conservation is obeyed. Thorium has 90 protons whereas U has 92 and the He has those two protons , the process is nuclear so no ionised Uranium is there.
Similarly in beta decay -as electron is not present in the nucleus in this process one neutron gets converted to proton and charge conservation is obeyed; as an example
40 K is a beta emitter(z-19) than the product is 40 Ca with Z value 20 and a beta particle i.e. electron.
the events are at energies where the atomic electrons/cheges do not have any role.( energies are of the order of MeV in nuclear reaction) whereas in atomic phenomena its of the order of eV or kev.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
drvrm said:
in alpha deacay the parent say 238U goes to thorium the daughter nucleus and an alpha particle -in this the charge and particle number conservation is obeyed. Thorium has 90 protons whereas U has 92 and the He has those two protons , the process is nuclear so no ionised Uranium is there.
Similarly in beta decay -as electron is not present in the nucleus in this process one neutron gets converted to proton and charge conservation is obeyed; as an example
40 K is a beta emitter(z-19) than the product is 40 Ca with Z value 20 and a beta particle i.e. electron.
the events are at energies where the atomic electrons/cheges do not have any role.( energies are of the order of MeV in nuclear reaction) whereas in atomic phenomena its of the order of eV or kev.

So the elektrons are just emittes in a chemical reaction with low energies?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top