Atomic Clocks & Moore's Law: Is There a Connection?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether there is a connection between Moore's Law and advancements in atomic clock technology. While both fields have seen significant technological progress, the consensus is that atomic clock accuracy improvements are not directly tied to the exponential growth of computing power described by Moore's Law. Instead, advancements in atomic clocks have been primarily driven by innovations in laser technology rather than computational advancements. The relationship between the two is acknowledged, but it is noted that accurate atomic clocks do not require advanced computing systems. Overall, the focus remains on the distinct technological trajectories of atomic clocks and computing.
roineust
Messages
341
Reaction score
9
Attached are two diagrams. One describing Moore's law, the other describing the development of atomic clocks since the 50's.

Is there a connection between these diagrams, not in the strict graph-math equivalence sense, but in the sense, that conclusions regarding atomic clocks' future accuracy advancements, can be derived, in a similar way, to that of Moore's law?
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    26.3 KB · Views: 450
  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    17.2 KB · Views: 417
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't really think there is a relation, at least not beyond the rather obvious observation that technology has advanced over the past few decades.
You do not need a fast computer to build an accurate atomic clock; computers are obviously used for control, data acquisition etc, but you don't need a computer (or digital logic) to build an accurate clock.

The development of better lasers has been much more important than the development of computers (but again. the two are obviously related but the same thing could be said for the development of better bikes).
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top