Atomic Form Factor: Finding f(|G|) with λ & θ

  • Thread starter Thread starter anon134
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Form
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the atomic form factor f(|G|) for a uniformly distributed negative charge over a sphere of radius R. The integral formulation for f(|G|) is presented, using the charge density function and the scattering angle θ. The initial attempt yields a complex expression, leading to concerns about the imaginary component of the form factor. Participants confirm the calculation's correctness but question the implications of having a complex form factor. The conversation emphasizes the need to understand the physical significance of the results in the context of scattering theory.
anon134
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. Let -Q charge be uniformly distributed over a sphere radius R. Find f(|\vec{G}|), the atomic form factor.
2. Let the incident xrays have wavelength \lambda, determine the dependence of f(|\vec{G}|) on \theta, the scattering angle.

Homework Equations



f(|\vec{G}|)=\int_0^{\infty} \rho(r) e^{i \vec{G} \cdot \vec{r}} dr


The Attempt at a Solution



\rho(r) = -Q \delta (r-R)

\vec{G} \cdot \vec{r} =\vec{G} \cdot r \hat{r} = |G||r| cos(\theta)

f(|\vec{G}|)=\int_0^{\infty} -Q \delta (r-R) e^{i |G|r cos(\theta)} dr

My instinct would be just to say:

f(|\vec{G}|)=-Q e^{i |G|R cos(\theta)}

But this leaves the term to be imaginary. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone have any thoughts?
 
Well, your calculation is correct from what I can see. What is the problem with an complex form factor?

Torquil
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top