Atoms decay via alpha emission have a half-life of 150 min

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the number of alpha particles emitted from a sample of 2.3 x 10^10 atoms with a half-life of 150 minutes. Initial calculations were corrected to find that after 30 minutes, approximately 2.00 x 10^10 atoms remain, and after 160 minutes, about 1.10 x 10^10 atoms remain. The difference indicates that approximately 8.98 x 10^9 alpha particles are emitted between 30 and 160 minutes. Participants noted the use of integral calculus is unnecessary since the decay formula is derived from it. The final calculations were confirmed to be accurate.
IKonquer
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
2.3 \cdot 10^{10} atoms decay via alpha emission have a half-life of 150 min.

How many alpha particles are emitted between t=30 min and t=160 min?

<br /> \begin{flalign*}<br /> 150 &amp;= \frac{\ln 2}{\lambda}\\<br /> \lambda &amp;= 0.046 <br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> K &amp;= K_{0}e^{(-\lambda)(t)}\\<br /> &amp;= (2.3 \cdot 10^{10})e^{(-0.046)(30)}\\<br /> K_{30} &amp;= 5.79 \cdot 10^{9}<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> K &amp;= K_{0}e^{(-\lambda)(t)}\\<br /> &amp;= (2.3 \cdot 10^{10})e^{(-0.046)(160)}\\<br /> K_{160} &amp;= 1.46 \cdot 10^{7}<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> K_{30} - K_{160} = 5.77 \cdot 10^{9} \text{ emitted}<br /> \end{flalign*}<br />

Did I do this correctly? And is there a way to use calculus to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
λ = ln(2)/150 ≈ 0.004621

You're off by a factor of 10.

K30 represents the number of atoms which remain undecayed after 30 minutes. The number you have for K30 is way under half of the initial sample, in a time that's 1/5 of the half-life.
 
Nice catch! Does it look right now? Also is there a way of using integral calculus to solve this?

<br /> <br /> \begin{flalign*}<br /> 150 &amp;= \frac{\ln 2}{\lambda}\\<br /> \lambda &amp;= 0.0046 <br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> K &amp;= K_{0}e^{(-\lambda)(t)}\\<br /> &amp;= (2.3 \cdot 10^{10})e^{(-0.0046)(30)}\\<br /> K_{30} &amp;= 2.00 \cdot 10^{10}<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> K &amp;= K_{0}e^{(-\lambda)(t)}\\<br /> &amp;= (2.3 \cdot 10^{10})e^{(-0.0046)(160)}\\<br /> K_{160} &amp;= 1.10 \cdot 10^{10}<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> K_{30} - K_{160} = 8.98 \cdot 10^{9} \text{ emitted}<br /> \end{flalign*}<br /> <br />
 
Yes, that seems better. I don't know why you want to use integral calculus, since the formula for radioactive decay was derived using integral calculus in the first place.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...

Similar threads

Back
Top