Atoms decay via alpha emission have a half-life of 150 min

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of alpha particle emissions from a sample of 2.3 x 1010 atoms with a half-life of 150 minutes. The decay constant (λ) is calculated as 0.0046, leading to the determination of remaining atoms at 30 minutes (K30 = 2.00 x 1010) and at 160 minutes (K160 = 1.10 x 1010). The total number of emitted alpha particles between 30 and 160 minutes is confirmed to be 8.98 x 109. The discussion also touches on the derivation of the radioactive decay formula using integral calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay and half-life concepts
  • Familiarity with exponential decay formulas
  • Basic knowledge of natural logarithms and their applications
  • Introduction to integral calculus principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the radioactive decay formula using integral calculus
  • Learn about the applications of decay constants in nuclear physics
  • Explore advanced topics in radioactive decay, such as decay chains
  • Investigate the use of differential equations in modeling decay processes
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or chemistry, researchers in nuclear science, and anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of radioactive decay processes.

IKonquer
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
2.3 \cdot 10^{10} atoms decay via alpha emission have a half-life of 150 min.

How many alpha particles are emitted between t=30 min and t=160 min?

<br /> \begin{flalign*}<br /> 150 &amp;= \frac{\ln 2}{\lambda}\\<br /> \lambda &amp;= 0.046 <br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> K &amp;= K_{0}e^{(-\lambda)(t)}\\<br /> &amp;= (2.3 \cdot 10^{10})e^{(-0.046)(30)}\\<br /> K_{30} &amp;= 5.79 \cdot 10^{9}<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> K &amp;= K_{0}e^{(-\lambda)(t)}\\<br /> &amp;= (2.3 \cdot 10^{10})e^{(-0.046)(160)}\\<br /> K_{160} &amp;= 1.46 \cdot 10^{7}<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> K_{30} - K_{160} = 5.77 \cdot 10^{9} \text{ emitted}<br /> \end{flalign*}<br />

Did I do this correctly? And is there a way to use calculus to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
λ = ln(2)/150 ≈ 0.004621

You're off by a factor of 10.

K30 represents the number of atoms which remain undecayed after 30 minutes. The number you have for K30 is way under half of the initial sample, in a time that's 1/5 of the half-life.
 
Nice catch! Does it look right now? Also is there a way of using integral calculus to solve this?

<br /> <br /> \begin{flalign*}<br /> 150 &amp;= \frac{\ln 2}{\lambda}\\<br /> \lambda &amp;= 0.0046 <br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> K &amp;= K_{0}e^{(-\lambda)(t)}\\<br /> &amp;= (2.3 \cdot 10^{10})e^{(-0.0046)(30)}\\<br /> K_{30} &amp;= 2.00 \cdot 10^{10}<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> K &amp;= K_{0}e^{(-\lambda)(t)}\\<br /> &amp;= (2.3 \cdot 10^{10})e^{(-0.0046)(160)}\\<br /> K_{160} &amp;= 1.10 \cdot 10^{10}<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> K_{30} - K_{160} = 8.98 \cdot 10^{9} \text{ emitted}<br /> \end{flalign*}<br /> <br />
 
Yes, that seems better. I don't know why you want to use integral calculus, since the formula for radioactive decay was derived using integral calculus in the first place.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K