Bug Attachment Disappearing Mystery on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gneill
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Users are experiencing issues with attachments not appearing in replies on Physics Forums, specifically with .gif files. Despite showing up in the preview, submitted posts often result in an "Invalid Attachment specified" error, and the attachments do not appear in the post after submission. There is speculation that the problem may relate to file extensions not accurately reflecting the file type. One user managed to resolve the issue by re-uploading the file, but inconsistencies remain. The situation is noted as a mystery, with users encouraged to monitor for further occurrences.
gneill
Mentor
Messages
20,989
Reaction score
2,934
Attachements not "taking"?

For some reason I can't seem to get an attachment to "stick" on a reply.

I uploaded a .gif as usual and inserted its address betwixt IMG tags. It shows up in the preview before submission, but after submission the attachment has disappeared. Following the link results in the "Invalid Attachment specified" vBulletin screen. Editing the post and selecting "Manage Attachments" shows no attachments associated with the post.

The thread in question is located here:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=669191

The post in question is post #6.

So, is it just me or is this happening to others as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Usually this happens when an image has a fake extension. What I mean is that just because it's named with .gif doesn't mean it's a gif file.
 


Greg Bernhardt said:
Usually this happens when an image has a fake extension. What I mean is that just because it's named with .gif doesn't mean it's a gif file.
Thanks. I'll take a look to see if I've mucked up the image creation somehow.
 


gneill said:
Thanks. I'll take a look to see if I've mucked up the image creation somehow.

Nope. Definitely a .gif file. I re-uploaded it and inserted the new address and this time it seems to be happy. Strangely, when I tried the same thing previously (once with the same file and filename, and once with a newly created image file with a different filename) it vanished after submission (but showed in the preview).

So a bit of a mystery. I'll keep an eye out for further occurrences.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
147
Views
18K
Replies
10
Views
3K
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
27
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
502K
Replies
4
Views
4K
2
Replies
67
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top