Audio broadcast via a physical wire

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of broadcasting emergency messages through physical wires, such as landlines or CATV cables, rather than traditional radio methods. Participants explore the concept of one-way audio transmission to speakers without the need for internet or mobile connections, focusing on potential applications in emergency situations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that broadcasting emergency messages via cable radio is possible, emphasizing the use of existing landlines or CATV cables.
  • Another participant notes that Alexander Graham Bell invented the technology for audio transmission, but questions how it could be applied in this context.
  • A participant expresses interest in the technology behind one-way audio transmission, seeking further details.
  • Concerns are raised about the declining use of landlines and the reliability of cell sites during emergencies, suggesting that a wired system could be beneficial.
  • One participant proposes that the concept resembles a remote public address system, questioning the practicality of using landlines given their maintenance costs.
  • Another participant discusses the use of coded alerts for different emergencies, referencing historical systems for fire alarms that utilized coded signals for location identification.
  • Links to various resources are shared, including patents and Wikipedia articles related to emergency alert systems, but the relevance of these systems to the proposed wired audio broadcast remains uncertain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality and effectiveness of using landlines for emergency broadcasts. While some see potential in the concept, others question its feasibility and maintenance costs, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations such as the declining use of landlines and the potential high maintenance costs associated with them. There is also uncertainty regarding the specific technology required for one-way audio transmission and how it would function in practice.

kadiot
Messages
282
Reaction score
82
Is there a way to broadcast emergency messages via cable radio? Its not really radio but audio going out from copper or fiber using existing landlines or CATV cables. No tuner needed, could just be a speaker. The system I am looking for does not need internet or mobile connections. I imagine it is an analog connection via a physical wire. But instead of listening to an audio recording via a handset, we can listen through a speaker.

Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes. It was invented by Alexander Graham Bell.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, russ_watters, berkeman and 2 others
anorlunda said:
Yes. It was invented by Alexander Graham Bell.
Yes, but how? Do you have the technology? Care to share? Thanks.
 
What is the expected range?
 
Here is the rationale:
1. Use of landlines is declining
2. In a disaster or emergency, cell sites may not work
3. Not everyone has UHF or VHF radio
4. In many places, landlines are still available or operational
5. AM and FM radio could still work, but additional means would still be welcome 6. cable radio going through landlines is one possible additional means
 
It sounds like you're talking about a remote address public address system. The man in the weather center shouts TORNADO into the microphone, and every house has a speaker to repeat that. Is that it?

Radio is better suited for that. The maintenance cost of landlines is extremely high. Think of all those crews you see parking their work truck near the road with a whole crew of men standing by.

Edit: A siren is also better for that purpose.
 
anorlunda said:
Edit: A siren is also better for that purpose.
But how will we tell the difference between an Amber Alert and a tornado warning and 12:00 noon and...
🧐
 
  • #10
chemisttree said:
But how will we tell the difference between an Amber Alert and a tornado warning and 12:00 noon and...
They already do that. They have coded pulses (blasts) for different events. There is not necessarily a code for all possible alerts, but enough.

I once lived in a village which had fire alarm boxes mounted on the telephone poles. Each one had a code identifying the location. (The alarm box was an automated telegraph, yet another Thomas Edison invention.) At the fire station, they repeated that code on the siren so that firefighters could respond directly to the scene rather than going to the firehouse first. If I remember right, it was a two digit nonary system, which allows for 81 locations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic and berkeman
  • #11
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Asymptotic and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K