Audio Video Receiver Power Limiting

AI Thread Summary
Power limiting in audio video receivers occurs as more channels are driven simultaneously, primarily due to the overall power supply constraints rather than any single component. Factors contributing to this limitation include the internal resistance of the power transformer, which can increase with current draw, leading to voltage drops and potential clipping. Additionally, the output transistors in amplifiers exhibit higher voltage drops under increased current loads, further reducing power output. Capacitor bank size plays a role in peak power handling, but continuous power output is more affected by the power supply's overall design and efficiency. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing receiver performance.
MichaelJHuman
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If you have ever seen the benchmark of an audio video receiver, you will see how the power drops off as more channels are driven at the same time.

For example, a benchmark done on my receiver, the Yamaha RX-V3900 showed 189 watts into one channel, and only 88 watts into seven channels.

Is anyone familiar with the factors which result in this power limiting?

One possibility is that the transformer used in the power supply limits the current which can be drawn. One theory I read, is that the internal resistance of the transformer starts increasing with current draw which causes a drop in in the output voltage. This drop affects the power supply rails causing clipping to happen at a lower voltage than the normal rail voltage.

Yet another possibility is that the power transformer has insufficient flux to transfer the needed current to the secondary. This implies that the transformer is saturating. I don't understand transformer saturation, so forgive me if this is not a reasonable reason for the limiting I am talking about.

Another possibility is that receivers have a limiting circuit.

I noticed in the service manual for my receiver that the early stages of each amplifier are connected to a different circuit than the final power transistors. This circuit takes the voltage rails as input, and outputs lines labeled +LB/+LB. Based on what little I know (and I know only basic electronics,) this could be limiting the rail voltage supplied to the early amp stages.

I am interested in understanding the main reason for the power drop off as more channels are driven at the same time. If anyone has any insights, I would appreciate it.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It is due to the power supply as a whole, not any single component. Although the size of the capacitor bank will probably be the single most important factor.
 
f95toli said:
It is due to the power supply as a whole, not any single component. Although the size of the capacitor bank will probably be the single most important factor.

The size of the capacitor bank should only apply to peak power.

In continuous power, having more energy storage does not help as far as I know. You just need enough capacitance to handle their job as filter caps.

My receiver has two 18,000 uf caps, which you would think would not limit continuous power in any way, but would put a limit on peak power draw on transients over average level.

Correct me if I am wrong.

You say the overall power supply is the limiting factor. But that does not help me. We should be able to identify the specific factors in the power supply which are limiting the power output in the situation I described.
 
The output transistors used in the amplifier are not perfect and they have internal resistance.

If they have to operate into a lower resistance load, they have to deliver more current for the same power and this causes more voltage drop acoss the internal resistance of the transistors.

So, they deliver less power. Amplifiers are usually rated to give their best output into 8 ohm speakers and less into 4 ohm and 2 ohm speakers.
 
vk6kro said:
The output transistors used in the amplifier are not perfect and they have internal resistance.

If they have to operate into a lower resistance load, they have to deliver more current for the same power and this causes more voltage drop acoss the internal resistance of the transistors.

So, they deliver less power. Amplifiers are usually rated to give their best output into 8 ohm speakers and less into 4 ohm and 2 ohm speakers.

Interesting, I have not heard anyone mention power transistors causing a higher voltage drop when the current is increased.

Do you think this is the main cause of power limiting?
 
Yes.
It still happens even if the power supply is regulated.

Another factor, though, is that the gain of most transistors drops off as the current increases, so you might get clipping in the drivers as they try harder to drive the main amplifiers.

This is all compromise when they design amplifiers.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
676
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
329
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top