Average IQ of Physicists: Is it Higher?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neyzenilhan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Iq Physicists
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the average IQ of physicists and its comparison to the general population. Participants acknowledge that physicists likely have a higher average IQ than the general population, with some estimates suggesting an average IQ of around 120 for college graduates, implying physicists would score even higher. The conversation also touches on the validity of IQ tests, questioning their ability to accurately measure intelligence. There is a consensus that IQ tests may favor academics, as they are designed by them, potentially skewing results. Some participants advocate for a deeper understanding of IQ, referencing notable studies that critique or analyze the concept of intelligence measurement. Overall, the dialogue reflects a complex view of IQ, intelligence, and the academic context in which these discussions occur.
neyzenilhan
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
what is the average IQ of physicists?
is it much higher than the average IQ of general population?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What'd you call a 'physicist', is the issue that comes to mind I guess.

But yeah, obviously. Not in the least because of how IQ tests work.
 
is this related to your 'I want to love' thread in any way?

did you find a physicist?
 
neyzenilhan said:
what is the average IQ of physicists?
is it much higher than the average IQ of general population?

It's infinity+3.
 
  • Like
Likes stehfahknee
Stratosphere said:
What does IQ have to do with intelligence?

What does the HP rating of an engine have to do with its power?
 
Well I've read that the average IQ of a college graduate is 120, so it only follows that the AVG IQ of physicists is much higher than 100.
 
  • #10
hamster143 said:
What does the HP rating of an engine have to do with its power?

It's not the same thing with an IQ. IQ measures mental deficiency not the other way around.
 
  • #11
I personally like to draw a firm line between 'IQ' as the theoretical normal distribution of intelligence and 'the result of an IQ test', as in, the assessment of such a test what one's IQ is. The former has very little theoretical basis, the latter is simply absurd to assume a test can measure a thing with such little basis to begin with.
 
  • Like
Likes stehfahknee
  • #12
My IQ was an A+
 
  • #13
neyzenilhan said:
what is the average IQ of physicists?
is it much higher than the average IQ of general population?
Since IQ tests are made by academics it is only natural that academics will do better on it, so yes.
 
  • #14
Klockan3 said:
Since IQ tests are made by academics it is only natural that academics will do better on it, so yes.

Unless the academic people realize this, and try to account for it, which they do in most of these test.
 
  • #15
Sometimes I get a feeling that anyone who wants to participate in a discussion that mentions "IQ" should be required to read at least one good non-PC study of the subject. Such as "The G factor" by Jensen, a work of the same name by Brand, or "The Bell Curve" by Herrnstein/Murray.
 
Back
Top