What is the average value of a simple harmonic function over one cycle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average values of a simple harmonic function over one cycle, specifically for a particle in one-dimensional oscillation defined by x(t) = a cos(ωt − φ). Participants confirm that the integral can be set up from 0 to 2π, with a substitution of variables from time to phase angle. The period of the oscillator is established as 2π/ω, allowing for proper integration limits. The importance of including the Jacobian factor during variable substitution is emphasized to ensure accurate results. Overall, the conversation clarifies the steps needed to compute the average values of position, velocity, and energy for the oscillating particle.
Eric_meyers
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"A particle of mass m executes one-dimensional simple harmonic oscillation
under the action of a conservative force such that its instantaneous x coordinate
is x(t) = a cos(ωt − φ).

Find the average values of x, x^2, x', and (x')2 over a single cycle of the oscillation.
Find the average values of the kinetic and potential energies of the
particle over a single cycle of the oscillation."

Homework Equations



Average value of a function = integral of a function / interval of the integral

The Attempt at a Solution



So I just want to make sure I can set the integral up like this:

integral from 0 to 2π (A cos(θ)) dθ

basically is it alright to convert A cos(wt - phi) ----> A cos (θ)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, a single cycle is one where the phase advances by exactly 2 pi. In fact you can take any integration interval from x to x + 2pi.

If you want to do it completely officially, you can relate the period to \omega, set up the integration from t = 0 to t = <one period further>, and make a substitution (in the mathematical sense, aka change of variables) \theta = \omega t - \phi.
 
CompuChip said:
Yes, a single cycle is one where the phase advances by exactly 2 pi. In fact you can take any integration interval from x to x + 2pi.

If you want to do it completely officially, you can relate the period to \omega, set up the integration from t = 0 to t = <one period further>, and make a substitution (in the mathematical sense, aka change of variables) \theta = \omega t - \phi.

but if you do that substitution wouldn't you be left with a 1/w when you substitute dt with dθ
 
Hi Eric! :smile:
Eric_meyers said:
but if you do that substitution wouldn't you be left with a 1/w when you substitute dt with dθ

Yes. :smile:

(but why didn't you just integrate wrt t in the first place? :confused:)
 
^Well because I didn't understand how to write my interval in terms of t, but I guess I can just set up my integral from 0 to t + 2*pi??
 
Nope.

When you have an oscillator with angular frequency \omega, what is its period (it should be a standard formula, so if you can't derive it look it up).
 
CompuChip said:
Nope.

When you have an oscillator with angular frequency \omega, what is its period (it should be a standard formula, so if you can't derive it look it up).

Oh it's 2\pi/\omega which makes sense because the \omega cancel and I'm left with 2\pi which is just the same behavior I started with at t = 0

So I could then set up my integral from t = 0 to t = 2\pi/\omega
 
Yes, exactly.
[In fact, you can set it up from any value t = t0 you like, to t = t_0 + 2\pi/\omega, you will see that t0 cancels out in the final result).

Now do the integration, performing a change of variables (substitution) to \theta \equiv \omega t - \phi. You will need to take the Jacobian factor into account (d\theta = \cdots \, \dt) as well as the change of integration limits. You will see how things work out rather nicely.
 
Back
Top