Average Velocity and Final Instantaneous Velocity

AI Thread Summary
In a curved path, such as circular motion, the average velocity over one complete rotation is zero because the body returns to its starting point, while the instantaneous velocity remains constant and non-zero. The instantaneous velocity reflects the constant speed of the body, but its direction changes continuously due to the curvature of the path. Average velocity, defined as displacement divided by time, can vary significantly, potentially reaching zero despite the constant speed. The discussion emphasizes the distinction between average and instantaneous velocity, particularly in the context of vector quantities. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing motion in physics.
Ibraheem
Messages
51
Reaction score
2
Suppose a body moving in a curved path at a constant speed would its average velocity for a specific time period equal its final instantaneous velocity at the end of this period ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No.

Consider a circular motion after one full rotation. The average velocity is zero (you returned to the original position!).
 
  • Like
Likes Ibraheem
To expand on what Orodruin said: Consider a mass moving in a circle at a constant speed. After one revolution it will have returned to the point it started. So its average velocity is zero. But its instantaneous velocity is clearly not zero.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibraheem
Thank you for replying
So if we consider a circular path, I suppose that the instantaneous velocity will equal the constant speed since the magnitude of the displacement vector will equal the distance at some instance during the period ?
 
Ibraheem said:
Thank you for replying
So if we consider a circular path, I suppose that the instantaneous velocity will equal the constant speed since the magnitude of the displacement vector will equal the distance at some instance during the period ?

To be precise, the magnitude of the instantaneous velocity will equal the constant speed.
That's a bit of a tautology though, because speed is defined to be the magnitude of the velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibraheem
Ibraheem said:
Thank you for replying
So if we consider a circular path, I suppose that the instantaneous velocity will equal the constant speed since the magnitude of the displacement vector will equal the distance at some instance during the period ?
If the path is curved then v(instantaneous) is changing all the time. Its magnitude is constant (same value as its unvarying speed) and direction is what is changing.
"Average" Velocity (which should be called Mean Velocity because there are a number of other values of a varying quantity that can also be called 'Average') will be displacement in a given time divided by time. Counter intuitively, it can be anything from 'speed' in tangential direction to zero (instantaneously). But that's vectors for you.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
48
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top