Ax and Ay As a linear combination of Atan and Arad

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the x and y accelerations (Ax and Ay) of a pendulum-like rod, given its tangential (Atan) and radial (Arad) accelerations. The user initially struggles with determining the angles between these accelerations and the x and y axes. A hint suggests expressing these angles in terms of θ or (90° - θ) to facilitate calculations. The user ultimately finds that Ax and Ay can be expressed as linear combinations of Ar and Atan using trigonometric functions. The final equations are Ax = Ar cos(90-θ) + Atan sin(90-θ) and Ay = -Ar sin(90-θ) + Atan cos(90-θ).
spirof
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is about a rod that is set in a pendulum way but that has an angle high enough so the SHM doesn't apply to it. It starts at Pi/2 until it reachs 0. I was able to find the tangential and radial acceleration about the center of mass but now I need to know the x and y acceleration about the center of mass.


Homework Equations



It says that I should be using the angle between Atan and Ax as a reference

The Attempt at a Solution



Completly stuck!
 

Attachments

  • prblm.png
    prblm.png
    29.4 KB · Views: 1,055
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi spirof! welcome to pf! :smile:
spirof said:
I was able to find the tangential and radial acceleration about the center of mass but now I need to know the x and y acceleration about the center of mass.

the only difficulty is working out the angle between tan (or rad) and x (or y) …

the hint is simply telling you to write those angles as either ±θ or ±(90° - θ) …

go for it! :wink:
 


tiny-tim said:
hi spirof! welcome to pf! :smile:


the only difficulty is working out the angle between tan (or rad) and x (or y) …

the hint is simply telling you to write those angles as either ±θ or ±(90° - θ) …

go for it! :wink:

Thanks u did put me on the track, I do possesses all the θ already for a definite period of time. Actually, correct if I am wrong, if I have and angle of 1.40 rad, then if if i do pi/2 - 1.4, which will give me something around 0.17 rad.

From there, i know that the angle between arad and ax is 0.17 rad, the same angle betweenay and atan. I would then be tempted to simply do ax = ar cos 0.17. However, I cannot assume that they form a right angle triangle. Anymore inputs?
 
hi spirof! :smile:
spirof said:
From there, i know that the angle between arad and ax is 0.17 rad, the same angle betweenay and atan. I would then be tempted to simply do ax = ar cos 0.17. However, I cannot assume that they form a right angle triangle. Anymore inputs?

i'm confused :redface: … there's right-angles everywhere …

which angle isn't a right- angle? :confused:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi spirof! :smile:


i'm confused :redface: … there's right-angles everywhere …

which angle isn't a right- angle? :confused:

Well between Ar and Ax, If u look at my attached image, you will see that I cannot assume that they are parts of a right angle triangle. Ax seems to long to be the hypothenus of Ar, doesn't it?
 
the length doesn't matter

all you need is the angle between ar and ax
 
tiny-tim said:
the length doesn't matter

all you need is the angle between ar and ax

Thanks, I went over the internet and I have found the solution. I have to express as linear combination of the Ar and Atan.

It sums up to Ax = Ar cos (90-θ) + Atan sin (90-θ)
Ay = -Ar sin (90-θ) + Atan cos (90-θ)
 
Back
Top