BA & BS Degrees in Physics: Advantages/Disadvantages

  • Thread starter Thread starter fillipeano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the differences between a BA and a BS degree in Physics, emphasizing that the distinction often lies in the rigor of the curriculum rather than the degree title itself. A BS degree is generally perceived as more prestigious, especially for graduate school applications, due to its typically more demanding coursework in the major. However, if a BA program includes strong physics and math courses, it can still be valuable, as exemplified by prestigious institutions like Harvard that only offer BA degrees. The conversation notes that there is no standardization in the US regarding these degrees, with some schools offering both and others only one, often reflecting historical choices rather than academic rigor. Ultimately, the specific courses taken are more important than the degree designation.
fillipeano
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
What are the advantages/disadvantages of getting a BA degree in Physics and getting a BS degree in physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your institution offers it, why would you get a BA? BS degrees hold a lot more clout when it comes to graduate school.
 
If your school offers only a BA, but the course requirements in physics and math are up to snuff, don't worry about the fact that it's called a BA. Harvard offers only BA degrees, after all. :wink:

In the US, there is no standardization about BS versus BA degrees. Some universities offer both, and the BS signifies a more rigorous curriculum in the major field. At some universities, it may signify only a difference in "general education" requirements outside the major. Smaller schools often offer only one or the other, and the choice may be merely a historical artifact.

What counts is the courses that you actually take, not the name of your degree.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
418
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top