Back:EMF and energy conversion in a PMSM

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the role of back-EMF in energy conversion within Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (PMSM). It highlights the assertion that energy conversion requires opposition, with back-EMF serving as that opposing force in motors. Participants explore the scientific basis of this concept, noting that back-EMF arises from induced voltage in the coils due to varying magnetic flux. The conversation emphasizes that as the motor operates, it minimizes magnetic energy density, converting this loss into mechanical energy. Overall, the relationship between back-EMF and energy conversion in motors is underscored as a fundamental principle.
noname12345
Messages
31
Reaction score
4
I'm seeking comments & opinions on a couple of statements I've come across in a book: "A textbook of electrical technology" https://books.google.co.uk/books?id...ved=0ahUKEwiI9MH7ntTKAhXDRhQKHalHBEAQ6AEIHzAD (amongst others) that states:

"In fact, it seems to be one of the fundamental laws of Nature that no energy conversion from one form to another is possible until there is some one to oppose the conversion. But for the presence of this opposition, there would simply be no energy conversion... whereas in motors back-EMF does this job."

Or more succinctly put in other places as: "Back-EMF is fundamental to the conversion of electrical energy to mechanical energy in a BLDC motor".

Thoughts? Supportive or against?

(Simple) scientific explanations to support or refute the statement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Buk said:
But for the presence of this opposition, there would simply be no energy conversion
I think it should be: for the absence of this opposition . . . .

Back-EMF in the motor is due to induced voltage in the coils, meaning that there is some (varying) magnetic flux through the coils.
The magnetic field in the airgap contains magnetic energy density. When the motor turns, it will try to minimize the volume of the magnetic field ( limiting the volume to a space between opposite north- and south- poles ), thus minimizing the amount of magnetic enegy. The loss of magnetic energy is converted to mechanical energy.
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Back
Top