Back of envelope calculations for thurst, specific impulse, etc.

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the thrust and power needed for a spacecraft to travel 630 million kilometers in one year with a 2000 kg payload, a constant acceleration approach is suggested. The simplest method involves accelerating quickly, coasting for a year, and then decelerating, while a more energy-efficient method entails constant acceleration for six months followed by deceleration. Using the formula for distance, a constant acceleration of approximately 1.2 micro-meters per second squared requires a thrust of about 2 millinewtons. Power calculations can be derived from the thrust and distance over time, considering kinetic energy at the midpoint. These basic calculations provide a foundational understanding for spacecraft design without delving into complex orbital mechanics.
engineer23
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
"Back of envelope calculations" for thurst, specific impulse, etc.

I am working on a project that is really out of my realm of experience, so if you could give me some basics, that would be much appreciated.
How do you determine the amount of thrust, power, etc. needed to travel a distance of 630 million kilometers in space? What if the payload is 2000 kg and I want the journey to take 1 year? Don't worry about trajectories and orbital mechanics...I just want a simple calculation. The thrust calculations I am familiar with are those in which the thrust is the force necessary to overcome drag, but I'm assuming there's a more general form? How do I get the specific impulse? Power?
Suppose I'm launching from high Earth orbit as well. I guess I need escape velocity for HEO?
I really have no experience with propulsion, but I just need some ballpark figures to base a design on.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Really it all depends on the gravity, if you not near any bodies and not in orbit then it depends on how fast you want to go - and what speed you want to be doing when you get there.

Simplest case would be to accelerate the 2000kg to full speed quickly, coast for a year and then spend a similairly negligible time slowing down.
Lowest energy case would be to accelerate constantly for 6months, then turn around and decellerate at the same rate for 6 months.

s = ut + 0.5 at^2
s = 630e9 m, t = 32e6 sec
a = 2 s/ t^2 = 1.2 e-6 m/s^2
So a constant force of 2mN would do it.
 
Last edited:
Thanks!
What is the power required for the journey then? Is it just mass*acceleration*distance/time?
 
Or you could use ke at the midpoint divided by the time to midpoint.
 
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Thread 'Where is my curb stop?'
My water meter is submerged under water for about 95% of the year. Today I took a photograph of the inside of my water meter box because today is one of the rare days that my water meter is not submerged in water. Here is the photograph that I took of my water meter with the cover on: Here is a photograph I took of my water meter with the cover off: I edited the photograph to draw a red circle around a knob on my water meter. Is that knob that I drew a red circle around my meter...
Back
Top