Background for Analysis and Topology

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessary background knowledge for studying Analysis and Topology, including the prerequisites and course structures encountered by participants. The scope includes theoretical foundations and educational pathways in mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a solid understanding of Calculus, experience with proofs, and familiarity with sets are essential for learning Analysis and Topology.
  • One participant recommends taking Analysis before Topology and emphasizes the importance of understanding metric spaces, which are often covered in Analysis.
  • A participant expresses confusion regarding their school's real analysis course, which focuses on topology and metric spaces, questioning if this is typical.
  • Another participant agrees that while metric spaces and some topology are part of real analysis, they believe real analysis should encompass more topics, such as differentiation and integrals.
  • There is mention of the "reconstruction" of real numbers, with some participants noting that this topic is typically addressed in real analysis, while others suggest it may also be covered in abstract algebra or set theory courses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the content and structure of real analysis courses, with some asserting that topology should not be the sole focus, while others question the appropriateness of covering certain topics in different courses. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the typical curriculum for real analysis.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions about course content and the definitions of terms like "reconstruction" of the real numbers, which may vary by institution. The discussion reflects individual experiences and educational contexts.

Acut
Messages
226
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I am a self-learner. What background knowledge is necessary to learn Analysis and Topology?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calculus, an experience with proofs and an experience with sets.

Personally, I would take analysis before you take topology. Make sure you know about metric spaces before topology (metric spaces are usually studied in analysis, but not always).

If you studied calculus from a rigorous book like Spivak, then you can take on a rigorous analysis book (like the excellent book by Aliprantis & Burkinshaw). Otherwise, the book "Understanding Analysis" by Abbott is very good.
 
Is it weird that my school's real analysis is a course on topology and metric space? I'm only first year but that's what my calculus teacher told me when i asked what real analysis was. He told me the course content for real analysis course at my school was metric space and topology.

I keep on hearing about "reconstruction" of the real numbers... but apparnetly that's done in abstract algebra and or set theory 3rd year course. Is this normal?
 
kramer733 said:
Is it weird that my school's real analysis is a course on topology and metric space? I'm only first year but that's what my calculus teacher told me when i asked what real analysis was. He told me the course content for real analysis course at my school was metric space and topology.

I keep on hearing about "reconstruction" of the real numbers... but apparnetly that's done in abstract algebra and or set theory 3rd year course. Is this normal?

That's a bit weird. Metric spaces (and a little topology) are certainly part of real analysis, but real analysis should be much more then that. It should also deal with differentiation, integrals, series, etc. It's a bit weird if you only see topology in your real analysis course.

Reconstruction of the real numbers is very often done in real analysis, because it's important to know what the real numbers are exactly. It is extremely weird that you do this in abstract algebra, I never heard of such a thing before. It would fit in a set theory course though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K