Background radiation and intensity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the implications of uniform microwave background radiation as evidence of the universe's expansion. The original poster questions whether this uniformity suggests that Earth is at the center of the universe, acknowledging the complexity of the topic. They reason that if the universe expanded unevenly in different directions, the radiation intensity should vary, leading to different redshifts. However, they realize that the perspective of any point in the universe can make it appear as if it is at the center, similar to raisins in an expanding loaf of bread. Ultimately, the understanding is that every point in the universe can be seen as both central and peripheral due to the uniform expansion.
peleus
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Quick question. I'm reading through Stephen Hawking's a brief history of time (interesting even though I can only understand 1/10th of it).

During this book he consistently mentions the fact the microwave radiation detected is near uniform in all directions, which is evidence that the universe is expanding as the wavelengths are red shifting.

This leads me to the question, does this also mean that we are in the center of the universe? I'm modest enough to believe this is almost certainly not the case, however where is my thinking wrong. To me equal radiation says that the waves have traveled a roughly similar distance to get to us as they are red shifted the same amount, however let's say the universe stretched 1 million light-year's east of us, and 20 million light-years west of us (for want of a better way of describing it simply) wouldn't the microwave radiation coming from the west be red-shifted a further amount due to the fact is has traveled longer? Should there be different intensities if that was the case?

I have no doubt my reasoning is wrong, however I'm looking to find out why it is wrong

Thanks.

Edit: I think I just figured out the answer but I'll see if people respond with the same reason I'm thinking.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Think of the universe as being a loaf of bread, and the Earth is a raisin. When you cook the bread, the dough expands in all directions. From the point of view of any raisin, it looks like all the other raisins are getting further away from you. From the raisin's perspective it may seem like it is in the center of the universe and everything else is expanding away from it. But the reality is that the distance between everything is increasing everywhere.
 
We are at the center of the universe. We are also at the furthest edge of the universe. The center and edge of the universe appears to be wherever [and whenever] you happen to be. It's like trying to find the center [or edge] of the surface of a sphere.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Back
Top