Baggage Carousel Movement at an Angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter eatingblaa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Movement
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for a suitcase to complete one rotation on an angled baggage carousel. Participants express confusion about the physics concepts involved, particularly regarding centripetal force and normal force. Key advice includes applying Newton's second law and resolving forces into horizontal and vertical components to find the correct values. There is a consensus that the friction force must be included in the free body diagram, and participants are encouraged to clarify their diagrams to avoid confusion. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately representing forces to solve the problem effectively.
eatingblaa
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1.Your suitcase is on a baggage carousel, Your suitcase has not slid all the way down the slope and is going around at a constant speed on a circle (r = 9.10 m) as the carousel turns. The coefficient of static friction between the suitcase and the carousel is 0.740, and the angle θ of the carousel is 7.16 °. How much time is required for your suitcase to go around once?



2.Im not relaly sure what this question means?



3. I am just looking for help about what this question means i don't relaly understand it?
How can I know how long it takes if i don't know how fast its going?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eatingblaa said:
How can I know how long it takes if i don't know how fast its going?
You're supposed to figure out how fast it's going. :wink:

(Hint: Apply Newton's 2nd law.)
 
hmmmm so f = ma, but in cicular motion that is f = ?

If I found the normal force I think I would be able to find the centripetal acceleration, but I am not able to.

Any other tip would be greatly appreciated
 
This is my latest attempt,

I put the x-axis in the direction of the slope and y-axis in the direction of the normal,

I resolved the components on the x-axis as follows,

Weight of Baggage = Static Force + Centripetal force

mgsinx = mgsinx(0.740) + ((mv^2)/r)cosx

using this I get a velocity of 3.20 m/s

and thus a time of 17.8 s

I think I am on the right track but this answer is wrong
 
eatingblaa said:
This is my latest attempt,

I put the x-axis in the direction of the slope and y-axis in the direction of the normal,

I resolved the components on the x-axis as follows,

Weight of Baggage = Static Force + Centripetal force

mgsinx = mgsinx(0.740) + ((mv^2)/r)cosx
You're on the right track, but you have the wrong value for the normal force and the sign of the centripetal force is off. Hint: Don't assume a value for the normal force, solve for it. (You'll need an equation for the y components as well.)

(The problem will be slightly easier to solve if you use horizontal and vertical components.)
 
Okay, firstly when you say the sign of the centripetal force is off, I assume you mean it should be negative. (Centripetal force acts towards the centre of rotation, so I thought this would be positive ) Any chance you could explain this?

Normal Force. I am not sure how to solve this.

im going to try using the horizontal and vertical x and y-axis now
 
eatingblaa said:
Okay, firstly when you say the sign of the centripetal force is off, I assume you mean it should be negative. (Centripetal force acts towards the centre of rotation, so I thought this would be positive ) Any chance you could explain this?
The component of the bag's weight acts down the slope, while the component of the centripetal acceleration will be up the slope. So a sign is off somewhere.
Normal Force. I am not sure how to solve this.
Just call it N. It's one of the unknowns in your two equations.
im going to try using the horizontal and vertical x and y-axis now
Good.
 
normal force something like Fn = -mg/cosx


diagram.jpg


okay that's my crappy diagram and might help you explain to me where I am going wrong
 
You shouldn't have the (-mg?) force. Part of the weight will be down the ramp... as you've indicated by the component (mg sin theta), and part of the weight (a component you are missing on your diagram) will press into the carrier and be supported by the normal force.

In your diagram, you've left out the friction force, which relates to the normal force, which you could find by clear indication of components.

Furthermore, if you're going to take a force (like the weight) in your free body diagram and replace it with components, be SURE you do this throughly, and then I suggest you mark it out in some noticeable way (texts tend to put a squiggle through it, but you could also "x" it out).
 
  • #10
You left out the friction force. Don't add extraneous stuff, like components. (Or -mg... what's that??)

You should just have: Normal force; weight; friction force.

Don't put Fc on a free body diagram. You'll get to that when you apply Newton's 2nd law.

Edit: As physics girl phd says, be careful to distinguish components from the original vector if you want to put them on the diagram. Otherwise you might end up counting a force twice.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top