Balancing a Plank on a Cylinder: Investigating Potential Energy Gain

  • Thread starter Thread starter theloathedone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the potential energy gain of a plank balanced on a cylinder when tilted through an angle theta. The initial approach involves using gravitational potential energy equations, but the user struggles with deriving the correct formula. They realize that a key length in their calculations is incorrect and suggest that it should be adjusted to \frac{r+d}{\cos{\theta}}. The user seeks guidance on how to correctly combine lengths to arrive at the desired potential energy expression. Clarification on these calculations is necessary to resolve the dead end in their solution attempt.
theloathedone
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform plank of thickness 2d and weight W is balanced horizontally across the top of a circular cylinder of radius r, whose axis is horizontal and perpendicular to the length of the plank. Prove that the gain of potential energy when the plank is turned without slipping through an angle theta in a vertical plane is:
W(r \sin{\theta} -(r+d)(1-\cos{\theta}))

Homework Equations


Clearly this is a problem of gravitational potential energy, U = mgh.

The Attempt at a Solution


I drew the diagrams, which are attached.
So from diagram 2, I get
\inc U=W(\frac{r+d}{\sin{\theta}}-(r+d)-((r+d)\tan{\theta}-r\theta)\sin{\theta}))
which is completely unlike what is to be proved.
I'm at a dead end and not sure how to proceed, thanks in advance for the help!
 

Attachments

  • Diagram 1.jpg
    Diagram 1.jpg
    3.8 KB · Views: 600
  • Diagram 2.jpg
    Diagram 2.jpg
    14.9 KB · Views: 664
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the length \frac{r+d}{sin\theta} is incorrect. If you fix that, you should be able to simplify the formula considerably.

I would also suggest trying to find an easier formula by adding two lengths.
 
Hmm ok I see that it should have been \frac{r+d}{\cos{\theta}} instead.

But I'm not sure how to find the two lengths to add to get the correct answer still.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top