Balancing chemical equations and calculations using equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a request for help with balancing chemical equations and calculations. The original poster shares images of their homework for review. Respondents point out specific issues, such as missing parts of answers and the need to double-check element counts on both sides of the equations. Overall, they acknowledge some correct work while suggesting areas for improvement. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accuracy in chemical equation balancing.
Matt1234
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

Had a fair bit of hoework my first day back with no answers. Would anyone mind looking over these to see if i did them correctly?
Thank you for your time.

http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/5117/46730937.jpg
http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/4489/56478985.jpg
http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/7176/29465682.jpg
http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/4357/28514399.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First worksheet:
3. Part of your answer got cut off and it looks like it says only "Cl" on the right. I would double check that equation balancing.
4. You're off to a good start but count how many of each element you have on each side.

I didn't look at all of the rest but I did look at your whole mole-mole page and that looks great, good job!
 
Thank you for your time molly. I made corrections to my sheet. :)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Chemistry How do we interpret the steps in the algorithm to balance a redox equation?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Why Am I Getting the Wrong Answer on My Molar Entropy Calculation?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Calculating transistor bias currents
Replies
2
Views
2K
A (simple?) question on fractions
Replies
9
Views
2K
Help resolving absolute motion paradox please.
Replies
10
Views
2K
Balancing Chemical Equations and Calculating Total Pressure in a Reaction
Replies
7
Views
4K
Differential Equations: Variation of Parameters
Replies
1
Views
4K
What Are Some Tips for Factorising Cubic Functions?
Replies
8
Views
5K
MHB Calculate % Increase from Scale Factor: Stumped? Help Here!
Replies
1
Views
6K
Chemically regenerating my auto's catalytic converter?
Replies
19
Views
7K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top