Differential Equations: Variation of Parameters

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the differential equation 4y'' - 4y' + y = 16e^(t/2) using the method of variation of parameters. The user initially derived the homogeneous solution as y = c1*e^(t/2) + c2*te^(t/2) and calculated the Wronskian as W(y1, y2) = e^t. However, upon verification, the user found discrepancies when substituting back into the original equation. Ultimately, the correct particular solution was identified as Y(t) = 2t^2*e^(t/2) using the method of undetermined coefficients, indicating a miscalculation in the variation of parameters approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order linear differential equations
  • Familiarity with the method of variation of parameters
  • Knowledge of Wronskian determinants
  • Experience with the method of undetermined coefficients
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of variation of parameters in detail
  • Practice calculating Wronskians for various functions
  • Explore the method of undetermined coefficients for different types of non-homogeneous equations
  • Review examples of solving second-order linear differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying differential equations, as well as anyone seeking to improve their problem-solving skills in this area.

broodfusion
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the particular solution to the differential equation using method of variation of parameters:

4y''-4y'+y=16e^(t/2)


The Attempt at a Solution



Set 4y''-4y'+y=0

then the homogeneous solution is:

y= c1*e^(t/2)+c2*te(t/2)

set y1= e^(t/2), y2= te^(t/2)

then y1' = (1/2)*e^(t/2), y2' = (t/2+1)*e^(t/2)

Wronskian = W(y1,y2) = e^t

http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/1822/dif1.jpg


I know i did something wrong because checking my answer by plugging Y(t) back into the O.D.E , left hand side and right hand side don't check out.

By using method of undetermined coefficients, Y(t) = 2t^2*e^(t/2), which is the correct answer.

So question is what did i do wrong using method of variation of parameters?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
nevermind, i figured it out myself
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K