Balancing Chemical Equations: How Much HCl is Consumed By 3.54 Mol of Mg?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HelloMotto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the mass of hydrochloric acid (HCl) consumed when 3.54 moles of magnesium (Mg) react according to the unbalanced equation Mg + HCl → MgCl2 + H2. Participants confirm that the equation must be balanced before performing calculations. The correct balanced equation is Mg + 2 HCl → MgCl2 + H2, indicating that 2 moles of HCl are required for each mole of Mg. The calculation reveals that 3.54 moles of Mg would consume 7.08 moles of HCl, which translates to approximately 255.24 grams of HCl. The initial answer of 10.6 grams is incorrect, highlighting the importance of proper balancing in stoichiometric calculations.
HelloMotto
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
help with this chem question please!

Homework Statement




One reaction that produces hydrogen gas can
be represented by the unbalanced chemical
equation:

Mg(s) + HCl(aq) --> MgCl2(aq) + H2(g)

What mass of HCl is consumed by the reac-
tion of 3.54 mol of magnesium? Answer in
units of g.

is the answer 10.6 g?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you balance the equation?
 
yes i did

i know the equation i posted is unbalanced, but when i did the calculation i balanced it first.
 
So show us how you did it...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top