Chemistry Balancing Redox Reaction: FeS2+Na2O2→Na2FeO4+Na2SO4+Na2O"

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on balancing the redox reaction FeS2 + Na2O2 → Na2FeO4 + Na2SO4 + Na2O. It highlights the electron transfer involved, specifically that Fe2+ is oxidized to Fe6+ and sulfur is oxidized from S-1 to S6+, totaling 18 electrons. To balance the reaction, the third half-reaction involving oxygen is multiplied by 9 to account for the electron transfer. There is a debate about whether to apply the multiplication to both sides of the semi-reaction or just the right side. Ultimately, the participants agree to multiply only the right side while balancing the left side accordingly.
DottZakapa
Messages
239
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
Balance redox reaction
Relevant Equations
FeS2+Na2O2->Na2FeO4+Na2SO4+Nao
FeS2+Na2O2->Na2FeO4+Na2SO4+Na2O

Fe2+ --->Fe+6+4e-
2S-1 --->2S+6+14e-
2O- + 2e- ---> 2O
The first two have a total of 18 electrons so
In order to balance the electrons i should multiply by 9 the third semireaction
(2O- + 2e- ---> 2O-2)x9

now this 9 is going to multiply the left hand in the semi reaction equation, isn't also multiplying the right hand side?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is, yes. But is this really the way you want to handle this ? Why not solve for $$a\text{A}+b\text{B}\rightarrow c\text{C}+d\text{D} + e\text{E}\ ?$$
 
DottZakapa said:
...now this 9 is going to multiply the left hand in the semi reaction equation, isn't also multiplying the right hand side?
Yes
 
sorted
i multiply by 9 just the right hand side
while i balance as usual the left hand side due to the multiple presence of the oxygen
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top